Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A15017824 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5119 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2015 18:47:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 4888 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2015 18:47:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 4877 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2015 18:47:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:47:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.192.50] (HELO mail-qg0-f50.google.com) (209.85.192.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:47:15 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e89so29366320qgf.9 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:45:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sW9sHrU6Cz1mNQSaAjfud2ivacL+uhumSFbqCIBkYLI=; b=Uwc9/s4RHTRYiuybbXUvTMwQ+pgnS+SZg26dCN8PatJTBQm/We89gR1hE4QnoxlwgJ O6x/zEGtpbAYripbaLi4HFaMSfZY8yg6Eu22aE7qwXQz96byZ/rVJ9L7vsjE5jyT1iaK +kjTzKQUCW98EPARqZ7M5C1tED9IU5+EUUV83wV49R+nDTZT8JF8CjiFGW27hiidKYk9 fwuSzxJigsEeaSmtRx4pjv+v/VS3HgzVWo0SEiNEdvDZREFT6KUyRITeYfJBO1e+Z44w lMvZ7xf3CzyMKgYhUEIU9qyQ4fsviS4sL1pqovthojCAp4/LdOObSsmHi+aa0atrFXh/ NgMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnirJcX1uONUoHuVp0VZq8TtegbJZQ3WqCztNugyd1dqOqDqZoG68O4nA61LnJGg3FB7rUo X-Received: by 10.140.232.84 with SMTP id d81mr668708qhc.15.1424198723162; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:45:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-74-138-23-246.swo.res.rr.com. [74.138.23.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e13sm16377730qaa.48.2015.02.17.10.45.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:45:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54E38C3E.40001@rcbowen.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:45:18 -0500 From: Rich Bowen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Big Data track? References: <54E383F0.5000900@rcbowen.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah. I kind of missed that connection. Can you give me an idea of how many track/days you're expecting to take up? Also when I might see your draft track? Thanks. On 02/17/2015 01:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad term ;-) > > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbowen@rcbowen.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:10 AM > To: dev > Subject: [ApacheCon] Big Data track? > > So ... is anyone going to step up to give us a Big Data track, or is there too much overlap with the Science track to make this meaningful? > Given that this was a substantial portion of our content at the last two events, it seems critical that we call this out in our schedule. > > Help? Anyone? > > --Rich > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon