community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Way talks
Date Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:47:34 GMT

> On 14-02-2015, at 11:47, Nick Burch <nick@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>> There is value in these sessions, some people are completely new and we probably
should still schedule them. However, I think we ought to do some new stuff along the lines
of:
>> 
>> How is the ASF different from other foundations?
>> Why should I bring my project to Apache?
>> How can I get paid to work on Apache projects?
>> How do I build a business around apache software?
>> Why doesn't the ASF pay for software development?
>> Why, after 15 years, do people see the ASF as a desirable place to take software?
>> Why does the ASF have a reputation for bureaucracy amongst the younger GitHub crowd?
>> Just what rules are immutable in the ASF?
> 
> Looks a great list to me!
> 
> My only comment is that these look like the titles of all the sessions from a Community
Track[1], rather than the parts of an abstract for just one talk. Is that what you had in
mind? Or do you think we can really fit all of that into a single session?
> 
> Nick
> 
> [1] Or even a whole conference! Say, called something like Transfer
>    Summit? ;-)

are there easily available data showing the benefits of plunking a project in Apache? One
could also use, I’d imagine, other measures of ecosystem robustness. Basically, some measure
or set thereof that illustrates the comparative benefit of Apache—?

Louis


Mime
View raw message