community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rich Bowen <>
Subject Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?
Date Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:27:46 GMT
So, the trouble with this process last year was that there were 4 
mutually contradictory docs floating around.

On 02/16/2015 03:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere...
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Bowen []
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:29 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?
> On 02/16/2015 11:49 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
>> Hi All
>> I'm trying to finalise the Content Technologies track for Austin, but
>> I'm struggling to know which talks have already been "claimed" by
>> other tracks. Some of the ones I want to include have review comments
>> which suggest they might have been, and some I'd just guess might be.
>> I can't seem to see anything conclusive in the review app though.
>> For the ones overlapping with Science&Healthcare, I'm getting round
>> this by having the chair of that track just mark up my google doc
>> spreadsheet with the talks he's already claimed, which just-about
>> works but may not scale! Is there a more general way I can see what
>> other track chairs are planning to take?
>> (If not, I can just send my list of talks, and hope for the best...)
> Yeah, that's why I've asked folks to post their proposed tracks here -- because there's
no good way to do this in the CFP itself. I hope that by the next event there will be a "track
chair" access level, where people can claim tracks.
> Better yet, if we can persuade LF to open source the CFP system ...
> --
> Rich Bowen - - @rbowen - @apachecon

Rich Bowen - - @rbowen - @apachecon

View raw message