Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54B7A127.1050601@apache.org>
References: <54B65789.60907@apache.org>
	<54B6A96A.1070805@les7arts.com>
	<54B6AA94.70009@apache.org>
	<BY2PR03MB49075A71032582E517B066999410@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
	<54B7753D.7000205@apache.org>
	<54B7A127.1050601@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:29:33 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAK2iWdTcCu_oTRWcxFLZN2BeCQsqDW8Sp+0q3-EZ=FUrPsa09w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New ComDev VM
From: jan i <jani@apache.org>
To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f7788e48ed050caf2b17

--001a1135f7788e48ed050caf2b17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

Very nice site, a little idea, sort the projects on
https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html?language#C, that makes it
easier to look at.

rgds
jan i

On 15 January 2015 at 12:14, Daniel Gruno <humbedooh@apache.org> wrote:

> Just a note/reminder: Whatever you push to svn goes public within 3
> seconds, so feel free to use the site for your tests if you like.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 2015-01-15 09:07, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> Hiya folks,
>> as part of trying out the new projects site, I have set up a VM inside
>> our infrastructure for us to use.
>> the VM is called projects-vm.apache.org and is tied to LDAP much like
>> people.apache.org is these days, thus you will need to have your public
>> ssh key in your LDAP profile in order to gain access. If you do have tha=
t
>> set up, and would like to access to the machine (some of you already hav=
e
>> access, others don't), just send me a line and I'll open up access for y=
ou.
>>
>> The projects VM is set up to serve content via httpd, but only to the
>> TLS-terminator nyx-ssl.apache.org (thus you will get a 403 Denied if you
>> visit the VM's web site directly). To get to the test site, use
>> https://projects-new.apache.org/ . Similar, to try out the (very simple)
>> editing features, use https://projects-new.apache.org/edit/ (requires
>> your LDAP username+password and allows you to edit data for those projec=
ts
>> where you are on the PMC).
>>
>> If you try out the editing features, do not that every edit you do will
>> generate an email with the new project data and send it to dev@community=
.a.o,
>> as a review measure.
>>
>> I hope this will make it easier for people to jump in and help with
>> creating the site :)
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>
>> On 2015-01-14 18:53, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> There is no "assuming" just do it :-)
>>>
>>> You have a number of ComDev PMC members saying +1, and you are a PMC
>>> member yourself. Let's have the code where we can start working on it a=
nd
>>> let's get it to feature parity with projects.apache.org ASAP. I agree
>>> with Rich that there is value in this already.
>>>
>>> This is not to exclude the much broader OfBiz proposal, but it looks to
>>> me like this solution is close to being ready to go as a replacement fo=
r
>>> projects.apache.org and I already see some simple improvements I can
>>> make in a coffee break at work :-)
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daniel Gruno [mailto:humbedooh@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:43 AM
>>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: projects.apache.org overhaul proposal
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015-01-14 18:37, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just as a note for the sake of truth, OFBiz has Content component
>>>> http://projects.apache.pw/projects.html?category#content
>>>>
>>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/doap_OFBiz.rdf disagrees ;-) but, assuming this
>>> gets accepted into comdev, you needn't worry about doap files any longe=
r,
>>> as you will be able to edit it online instead.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>>  I very like what I saw, kudos!
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Le 14/01/2015 12:48, Daniel Gruno a =C3=A9crit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>> I was having a conversation with Rich (Bowen) some weeks ago, and the
>>>>> sentiment was that our projects page ( projects.apache.org
>>>>> <http://projects.apache.org> ) could use a big overhaul. It's
>>>>> outdated, not very user friendly, doesn't really compile the data
>>>>> into anything useful (mostly just displays "raw" data) and it's
>>>>> difficult to navigate (no search abilities, no actual overviews).
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, I propose that the community development project takes
>>>>> over this project from Infra, which has no interest in
>>>>> continuing/maintaining it, and revamps it with both a new site design
>>>>> and a new LDAP/JSON-based information system which would enable
>>>>> people to edit their project details online without having to
>>>>> upload/change RDF files when something happens. This would also mean
>>>>> that everything could be rendered in the browser instead of relying
>>>>> on daily cron jobs to compile the page, and also allow us to add some
>>>>> inspiring/interesting graphical charts and overviews/timelines.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been working on a proposal that follows these ideas, which is
>>>>> available for preview at http://projects.apache.pw/ for those
>>>>> interested. Only the first two tabs in the menu currently work (and
>>>>> the extensive search feature), but that is still most of what the old
>>>>> site has and then some. I am pondering on moving some of the front
>>>>> page stuff to the 'Timelines' tab instead, feedback is appreciated on
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, comments, feedback, questions, anything is most welcome,
>>>>> especially comments on whether you:
>>>>> 1) think comdev should be responsible for the projects directory
>>>>> 2) think the proposal looks good/swell/nifty/whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> A few notes on the search feature:
>>>>> - You can search for virtually anything within a project, types,
>>>>> languages, descriptions, bug-trackers etc
>>>>> - Try typing your committer ID or Apache ID into the box, and it will
>>>>> show all projects you are a part of
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is consensus for moving this into comdev framework and
>>>>> collaborating on this, I will commit the proposal to a sub-folder in
>>>>> the comdev svn repository and ask infra for a VM where we can set
>>>>> this up.
>>>>>
>>>>> With regards,
>>>>> Daniel.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>

--001a1135f7788e48ed050caf2b17--