Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of leftyleverenz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <86A6B90B-9CB0-4F25-BC01-B86D7AB43C10@classsoftware.com>
References: 
 <CAEWfVJ=ErFT7K_bv63YZavzW=TPKXh2Azz=L3Z-FzYnh14TcOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJnq1qT=EP6yHa4Ubb6QW0g1vpJmuXA-A+Jxij_DZ+=4GQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54B6C3A8.8000705@gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJ=kr7ALS+p4v2nmShJsMo4j5YsxSi9kzEDtiZ=K9MGnog@mail.gmail.com>
	<54B83F32.503@gmail.com>
	<0B39D46E-61D9-49C9-8070-25ACB5843CAD@classsoftware.com>
	<54B9CE43.4010508@apache.org>
	<86A6B90B-9CB0-4F25-BC01-B86D7AB43C10@classsoftware.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:09:16 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CACEcauUimbfD-mzu1z95RA-L6JhUyybzCtj56mS6QbB5Xvgd-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A maturity model for Apache projects
From: Lefty Leverenz <leftyleverenz@gmail.com>
To: dev@community.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fa9b06a97ef050cd3c445

--001a113fa9b06a97ef050cd3c445
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Some trivial edits:

LC10
The code is released under the Apache License, version 2.0      <*needs
terminal period*>

QU20
The projects puts a very high priority on producing secure software.
<"project puts">

*Consensus building*       <"Consensus *B*uilding" to match init caps on
"License and Copyright">

*Optional:*  <*change " - " to " -- " in CS10 and RE40*>

*Utterly trivial:*  <*space before footnote 3 in RE10, or remove spaces
before all other footnotes*>


-- Lefty

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I thought that was part of the Open Source definition?
>
> Not quite (AFAIK), there's no royalties allowed on redistribution but that
> doesn't mean you can't charge for it either initially or when
> redistributing it as part of a bundle.
>
> "The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the
> software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing
> programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a
> royalty or other fee for such sale." [1]
>
> Perhaps change CD10 to this?
>
> The project produces royalty free Open Source software.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1.http://opensource.org/osd

--001a113fa9b06a97ef050cd3c445--