community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <>
Subject Re: Some maturity model comments
Date Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:31:42 GMT

Thanks for the comments in this thread, I (think I) have incorporated
them in revision 14 of

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Benson Margulies <> wrote:
> CD40: perhaps change 'previous version' to 'released version'


> CD50: the committer is not necessarily the author;...

Added something about thirdy-party contributions

> LC20: do we need to explain what we mean by 'dependencies'?...

Left that as a TODO for now, it might be good but I don't know what to write :-/

> LC50: the footnote seems wrong; the ASF does not own copyright,
> rather, the author retains, and grants the license.

Fixed as per Rob's suggestion

> ...RE40: do you want to add an explicit statement that legal
> responsibility falls upon the head of the person who happened to run
> the build?...

Chickened out on that one for now - do we have that info somewhere
else that I could point to?

> QU20: Maybe we need to expands on 'secure'?...

Added a footnote

> QU40: Not all communities might agree....

Let's discuss in a separate thread

> ...IN10: I fear that a more detailed definition of independence is going
> to be called for here to avoid controversy....

Added a footnote.

Thanks for the comments, do those changes work for you guys?


View raw message