community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrea Pescetti <>
Subject Re: A maturity model for Apache projects
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:26:45 GMT
On 06/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> With regard to "competitors," I just remind myself that forking is a
> feature and that community before code means not acting like a
> competitor.  One should not accept the so-called competitor's terms
> of debate, no matter how much individuals might see and even prefer
> "competition."

I'll just note that "Forking is a feature" is totally unrelated to what 
I wrote. If Microsoft starts a campaign to advocate IIS over the Apache 
HTTP Server, that PMC will have to follow your route and "not accept the 
terms of debate" or it will have to give an answer, and part of it may 
have to be discussed confidentially (even the Foundation Press Releases 
are not discussed in public before they are issued; in the real world... 
this happens).

The discussion that followed seems to clearly show that this stays 
undecided. So, coming back to the maturity model, I think that we can 
recommend a wise usage of the private list, but not necessarily restrict 
it to votes and security. Trademark violations for example surely belong 
there, and more can belong there depending on the project and on its 
public image.

A note to reassure those who oppose it: I've never seen marketing 
strategy discussions on the private lists I'm subscribed to. I'm 
definitely not a marketing-oriented person, but I don't see marketing as 
inherently evil either.


View raw message