Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CC6110772 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89188 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2014 23:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 88986 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2014 23:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 88975 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2014 23:46:54 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:46:54 +0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id A83E51A00C5 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f15so2446355lbj.13 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 15:46:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.170.170 with SMTP id an10mr9497224lac.46.1417909610231; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 15:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.10.16 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 15:46:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54839357.2040208@elyograg.org> References: <547CA326.4090306@rcbowen.com> <548311F4.5050904@apache.org> <54839357.2040208@elyograg.org> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:46:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ApacheCON EU Budapest is history but will forever be remembered. From: jan i To: "dev@community.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117748ba44a31050994ce8e --089e0117748ba44a31050994ce8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 7 December 2014 at 00:37, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 12/6/2014 7:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > I'm sure that active people (committers, say) who were not in Budapest > > explicitly decided not to come. So the problem is not awareness, but > > perceived value in the context: these are just invented examples, but > > they may have decided not to attend due a busy period, to travel costs, > > to the conference fee, to a perception that they wouldn't make enough > > business contacts if this was important to them... > > > > Of course I can't guess why others didn't come, but guessing/asking for > > that would probably help for future events. > > I can't recall whether I explicitly saw any early promotion regarding > Budapest. I was interested in going, but the location immediately > eliminated it from consideration simply due to cost for travel and > accommodations. Questions about the cost of the conference, as well as > passport and visa requirements, weren't even considered. > > I am going to try VERY hard to make it to the next North America event > in Austin. If I can make it, it will be my first Apache event. Google > Maps says it's a 19 or 20 hour drive from my current location in Salt > Lake City. I happen to know someone who lives there, so accommodations > may also end up being very cheap. > > One thing that's not clear from the Austin registration page is what the > cost (if any) is for spouses to attend the conference, assuming I can > convince mine to come. The committer registration fee is $275 or $375 > depending on the date of registration, but it's not clear whether that > is per-person, and how it applies to spouses. > HI That sounds like a long drive to me....but being in the EU we might see distances differently. The registration fee is pr person, but the evening events tend to have a more relaxed approach...at ACEU budapest spouses ended up getting an invitation for the evening events. rgds jan i. > Thanks, > Shawn > > --089e0117748ba44a31050994ce8e--