Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDB7410CC1 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28482 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2014 16:41:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 28283 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2014 16:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 28182 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2014 16:41:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:41:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pierre.smits@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.178] (HELO mail-lb0-f178.google.com) (209.85.217.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:40:35 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w7so1362061lbi.37 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3OxuZDg/RWhCX/4JWKJmuBR14n7w1Pl9yVYW54p3xgM=; b=JZWHlHNDoUH/GZNdgbmgPZdBiOzjcyt+Z3UbbcocqvfUh1V0PCnMfoqAIO9eJHX5KH XOZ/+lbdm3VE/ixzVXd6fbcG2Iy5JVtNrzyPVVOOfmQYX13f5vxGeBHWEv1U1swjUnog kpYB3m0l9s5apcnEgN2oPtS4ZDRWee4hNoZ9j2Ke+6cRbw0F/SphmYFzCkIBOvydMsyE RIoyngXltv2bY0Nc5F/8GNZANgZ+y8haaw1FvNjFL3QIsDABxRk/dKPdXN3K0OKqGWa6 NPQEdXuqvOPd0wBHEU7smzktZPOinDwMTzRPEnixaTG/L0ZZTBmp5RnUmGj/2t9qkYa1 7xSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.93.231 with SMTP id cx7mr4216963lbb.89.1413391233728; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.170.77 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:40:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ec9d2ef5ddb4c8ab02de972e1f97de6@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <543E6113.2030206@shanecurcuru.org> <4ec9d2ef5ddb4c8ab02de972e1f97de6@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:40:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The ASF and Apache OFBiz (was: Re: ASF Status website and project health reporting) From: Pierre Smits To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Cc: "dev@community.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11348be86a446c050578cac8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11348be86a446c050578cac8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ross, As far as I can tell, only Rich has contacted the community of the OFBiz project regarding management of fundraising activities. I assume you that is what you meant, not contracted. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote: > Note, we have recently been discussing how OfBiz can help with management > of the fundraising activities. Melissa (our EA) is in contract with the > project. It seems to me that this would be the simplest starting point (a= nd > isn't public facing, so less of a design overhead). > > Other than that, as Shane says, anything that does happen needs to happen > with the infra team on board. > > Thanks Ross > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Shane Curcuru > Sent: =E2=80=8E10/=E2=80=8E15/=E2=80=8E2014 4:57 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org > Cc: user@ofbiz.apache.org; Jacques Le > Roux > Subject: Re: The ASF and Apache OFBiz (was: Re: ASF Status website and > project health reporting) > > The best place to start this discussion in terms of needs is over on the > dev@community mailing list - no need to include folks individually > unless they ask. > > There are several different issues to work on: > > - Need and design: what does the ASF or some projects actually need, and > how could we better present a design that would be easier to use and > maintain? Note also that projects use a wide variety of site generation > and maintenance tools, and to get better adoption any new tool needs to > fit easily into existing Forrest, Maven, or other tools that various > projects use (i.e., adoption on a per-project level, like for > project.a.o/mailinglist pages, would be up to each project) > > - Work: Who is actually going to provide the code, take feedback from > various parties, and help maintain any new solution? This is where > having an iterative design is important, because many of these efforts > start with great new volunteers, but never get finished or fully > deployed when the rest of the world interferes with people's dayjobs. > > - Code: Any apache.org hosted solution needs to be maintained by the > infra team. In particular, infra is moving to centralize all the > per-person data into our custom LDAP scheme, which is being expanded to > include PMC membership and plenty of other data. Some info is on the blo= g: > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/tags/ldap > https://id.apache.org/ > > There's been a lot of updates to how the core LDAP is being used and is > exposed on http or https endpoints in the past year, so it would be > useful to get a better overview of what the core people/projects data is > available already. > > - Shane > > On 10/13/14 9:19 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Hi Gabriella, > > > > I have been pondering a bit on how Apache OFBiz could support The ASF a= s > > the unified front end regarding: > > > > * subscribing to and unsubscribing from mailing lists of projects and > > offices > > * profiling the Projects, Corporate Officers, ASF Members, Vice > > Presidents, PMC Members, Committers, Contributors and Offices > > * the invitation processes regarding new ASF Members, PMC Members and > > Committers > > * the 'Change of Guard' process regarding Board Members, Office and > > Project VPs > > > > Based on some demo data I have mocked up how this could look like and > > have created a Powerpoint to show and explain this a bit. > > In the attached PDF you can get a feel of some screenshots. In the note= s > > of each slide you'll find a short description. > > > > If you would like to investigate and/or pursue the possibilities > > further, feel free to contact me to exchange ideas, viewpoints, etc. If > > you have trouble accessing the attached file please send me a note. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > *ORRTIZ.COM * > > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > > Based Manufacturing, Professional > > Services and Retail & Trade > > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Gabriela Gibson > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Pierre Smits > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Recently we exchanged some thoughts (twitter and otherwise) > regarding the > > > status of Apache top level projects and about how the reporting b= y > the ASF > > > to the projects and the wider communities could be improved. > > > > > > Currently the status pages at http://status.apache.org regarding > project > > > health (commit activity and mailing lists) don't allow drill down > into > > > individual projects. Is it achievable to get this kind of > functionality? > > > > > > Can we (as the ASF) also provide insights in number of people > joining and > > > leaving the mailing lists of the projects and show what the > trending topics > > > over the periods? > > > But also reporting on average depth and width of mailing list > threads? > > > > > > I do believe that these kind of insights will help monitoring > project > > > health and investigate where projects can improve regarding > community > > > building. > > > > > > > > > I'm not so sure that mailing list subscription counts are very > > representative -- I recently unsubscribed from almost every forum I > had > > ever joined because classification by labelling in gmail is a hit > > and miss, > > and the deluge of mails that were incorrectly sorted was too much. > > > > Instead, I use the web interfaces for those forums now. > > > > So, I would like to see the mailing list web interface be improved: > > > > Better thread navigation; and the ability to 'one-click > > (un)subscribe' to a > > given thread or a watch for keywords in the subject(subject to bein= g > > logged > > in). Being able to choose a digest or continuous format on a > per-case > > basis would also be nice. > > > > If that could be done, collected statistics about participation > would be > > far more reliable and informative. > > > > G > > -- > > Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --001a11348be86a446c050578cac8--