Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA2AA11E2C for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92084 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2014 19:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 91912 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2014 19:21:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 91885 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2014 19:21:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 19:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.170] (HELO mail-lb0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 19:21:40 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 10so4330113lbg.15 for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LUJG6IwejW3X0L6UGxg7D5SBGp2SRNpO0wSHPo/psoo=; b=HlJ/9Iw6rSkQHZ3nI/XhIusG9n1rTSL83CeuQmBNN2AxWekt9+07hVM0VOzU4fEHBX rcNYLd20mE7ZFFH5H/I4I8kK4kFHyTPP9sx/AcHSnmQ61k786eT7jh446Tk9hnJhZRaC 1POz99vfDtFgKSmRRRXAfxxUFQ406OVQPjg34= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LUJG6IwejW3X0L6UGxg7D5SBGp2SRNpO0wSHPo/psoo=; b=DOmzDR0b8wmwDZ4Zfq7nNGjlQXJte75dRXuWIkOjl7cHHv9cISVsPjGDEbyPll4TsO V15j8KJ5Wio1kPjus8Zuzbnx7WON0wPbrBceZDbVS8QyQDFCW1B1uNtXjhXdSrSH2Ls4 yuTHporo+6lt+ES/MUxRWBnEAVZWiFUByZDX1Je3d6b+R7KOiGG9usk0UMWMof8gF0VT vVqRJ0bqoyNkEaC18xhrW5KU35VbjjPqZkSi9HYumQIp5FkrPS4+VYeJbHgDSOUsvqKn uv79Tdo46bJ0vzRKssxzZKf49aoC+ew8jXpopdckImnkQ4lnRLES9QDVQ0BkiM+tc3LC ns7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlhLTbD8iIXZjlyV5aiSd8evgn9mPFo+4udLD2c/WsKhVBjVClQc24GTCT3l67Q7MqbHTr9 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.195 with SMTP id le3mr29242073lab.16.1404847275770; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.247.106 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [90.213.160.173] Received: by 10.112.247.106 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53BC3BB0.9090709@beamartyr.net> References: <53bbcf62.a9b8b40a.459f.ffffab4a@mx.google.com> <53BBD180.7020101@beamartyr.net> <53bc29dc.320db40a.50e8.1c4e@mx.google.com> <53BC3BB0.9090709@beamartyr.net> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:21:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposing for Apache Member? From: Ross Gardler To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01227abcd6199304fdb37e3e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01227abcd6199304fdb37e3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It is correct that VPs (e.g. PMC chairs) are not necessarily Members, though it is common that such individuals are nominated for membership at the next opportunity. If we made foundation membership a requirement for PMC chairs we would be limiting the project communities choice for the role of chair based on foundational merit. That would not be appropriate. On 8 Jul 2014 19:43, "Issac Goldstand" wrote: > Ross, > > So to clarify, not all ASF officers are necessarily ASF members? > > Issac > > On 06/07/2014 16:14, Ross Gardler wrote: > > The officer is the PMC chair, not all chairs are members. > > > > Sent from my phone - please forgive brevity and typos > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Issac Goldstand" > > Sent: 7/8/2014 12:10 > > To: "dev@community.apache.org" > > Subject: Re: Proposing for Apache Member? > > > > On 06/07/2014 09:48, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> > > [snip] > > but not all projects have existing members acting as the eyes and ears. > > [/snip] > >> > > > > Don't they? > > > > "In addition to the officers of the corporation, the Board of Directors > > may, by resolution, establish one or more Project Management Committees > > consisting of at least one officer of the corporation, who shall be > > designated chairman of such committee, and may include one or more other > > members of the corporation." > > > > http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html#6.3 > > > > Issac > > > > > > > > > > --089e01227abcd6199304fdb37e3e--