Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D97F6113E3 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90505 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 12:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 90327 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 12:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 90316 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2014 12:55:57 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:55:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-la0-f43.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username jani, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:55:56 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hr17so396067lab.16 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 05:55:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.36.74 with SMTP id o10mr4474756laj.52.1405083354874; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 05:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.204.40 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 05:55:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53bbcf62.a9b8b40a.459f.ffffab4a@mx.google.com> <53BBD180.7020101@beamartyr.net> <53bc29dc.320db40a.50e8.1c4e@mx.google.com> <53BC3BB0.9090709@beamartyr.net> <20140708192752.GO3402@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:55:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposing for Apache Member? From: jan i To: "dev@community.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c8263f4bd604fdea7658 --089e0158c8263f4bd604fdea7658 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 11 July 2014 14:45, Pierre Smits wrote: > The hat 'User' states that the following: > > They contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers > in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions > > The hat 'Developer' states that the following: > > a user who contributes... > > > In general, a user only consumes the work (the software, the documentation, > the postings on the mailing list). They aren't active as contributors (in > any way, within the community of a project). As soon as a user gets > involved in a project (participating in discussions in the mailing list, > posting JIRA issues, etc) he becomes a contributor to the project and its > work. This person might be a developer or not, a documentalist or not, etc. > > Having the 'contribute' in both descriptions makes it ambiguous. Removing > the aspect of contributing from the hat 'User' partly removes that > ambiguity. Renaming the hat 'Developer' to 'Contributor', does the other > part. > A user and a developer are two faces on the same coin, they both contribute to the project but of course with different parts. In AOO we get a lot of highly valued opinions, suggestions and error reports from our users. These items are contributions. Once the users get involved in the project, they seem get to be committers. I tend to agree with you, that there are no reason to diferentiate user/developer, problem is that the world in general does that. > > Subsequently, the hat 'Committer' could be redefined with following: > > A *committer *is a contributor, that was given write access... > > Actually a committer is quite a lot more, than just having write access. rgds jan I. > > Regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM * > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Pierre Smits > > wrote: > > > How can it be that 'Contributor' is not an official 'hat'-definition in > > the > > > (explanatory) pages of the ASF? While so much importance is placed on > > > correct usage of terminology in projects and elsewhere, based on those > > > pages. > > > > > > Shouldn't the document > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles be amended > > (with > > > respect to definitons 'User' and 'Developer) in such a way that it > > reflects > > > that? > > > > I don't think a generic "Contributor" adds much to that document. What > > confusion about the term contributors would the hypothetical update > > clarify? > > > --089e0158c8263f4bd604fdea7658--