Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05EC9F723 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57590 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2014 18:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 57314 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2014 18:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 57302 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2014 18:21:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:21:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.192.174] (HELO mail-pd0-f174.google.com) (209.85.192.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:21:08 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z10so2614090pdj.19 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AflK4bVMzCVXPlRSk67PGkvV4jgoaaDfrsEZN/JVB30=; b=jLwL/g+WLPFwCyyRVfa8voIDqzXud8m5qn9WnXF2hw7cUUj8/nZwE6Ij9lmBP1V/2m ViO+Dg8SsEDxPLHGgPB6cfFnGGYYjG9VFaI4YzKUxmol+EdHxs4PTInzK/Zo6uHpK6dV 8yOoSYUcFTkrOs/PAoc2xvMwAjtAdWBxw1GAukOJvW1iSDYYofl9TNezdSbhrEDkNdXZ 4DaqS3t936pUHZ4nR9mZwlVQbcrz02PErBWUjFTs4iI+gmZK4+40aG9xBR2A2EqCX8XN r2DH1BsSQwIdm8sA1QlOb8yTmxBt3f/+Po+RSbjtHbPYIAHZFO+D2WwmlSb1FWS+w+cD ZwYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYOTZNk3gCDwECuI2jU0SkJx0xtDGqNDp3mthUKdiU8AfErMj835/e4AV8UVukT/xJ0Yyp X-Received: by 10.66.240.130 with SMTP id wa2mr9661764pac.73.1398450047296; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (74-138-17-157.dhcp.insightbb.com. [74.138.17.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tf10sm17379707pbc.70.2014.04.25.11.20.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <535AA77A.2070808@rcbowen.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:20:42 -0400 From: Rich Bowen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: ApacheCon Europe status and ToDo References: <5357ED0A.7000301@rcbowen.com> <5358C524.1010402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <5358C524.1010402@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/24/2014 04:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/04/2014 Rich Bowen wrote: >> If you would like to be involved in reviewing the content for the >> conference, please let me know. > > I missed Denver but I'll be happy to help with Budapest. Account > "pescetti". > >> The conference format is 3+2 - three days keynotes and conference >> sessions, then two days other stuff. Other stuff includes tutorials (if >> we can get them to fly this time), the CloudStack conference, a one or >> two day Open Office user event (depending on the content we can get for >> this) > > The OpenOffice (one word please) I'm very sorry. I have been trying to actively train myself to write that correctly. I won't do that again. > event sounds like a wonderful opportunity. It would need to be > substantially different from the "main" ApacheCon in terms of > audience, fee and spirit. How can we make it excellent? Is this a task > of the Linux Foundation, of the PMCs, of some individuals? I see a > problem in waiting for content before having some basic event details > settled. Of course, feel free to bring this to the PMC if you need > feedback, a small discussion has already started. > I suspect that what we're looking at is "free with ApacheCon attendance" and then some nominal fee for everyone else. We're looking into what would be the minimum break-even fee that we could charge for this, if we skip all amenities like lunch, event events, and so on, and we'll get back to you on that just as soon as we can. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon