Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:36:10 +0000 (GMT)
From: Nick Burch <nick@apache.org>
To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org>
Subject: Re: ApacheCon community panel
In-Reply-To: <531E007E.30107@rcbowen.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403101831060.2023@urchin.earth.li>
References: <531E007E.30107@rcbowen.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Do folks think that this will make a good panel discussion (obvious, I 
> do), and, if so, who should participate in such a panel? I'd love to see 
> someone from the board, and someone from the Cordova PMC. Suggestions as 
> to who that should be?

I'd vote for someone from infra too. My reading of the debate was that 
there'd be additional tooling needed to support a community that wanted to 
release that fast if they were to still maintain the levels of checking we 
want + not burn out trying. A comdev volunteer might round it out as well, 
since there were concerns about how volunteers and new community members 
would be encouraged + supported to participate if there were lots of "work 
hours" community members involved in the fast cadence process.

As for the board member, do you want a fireworks filled session, a lively 
debate, or a quiet but very productive one? ;-)

Nick