Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Message-ID: <531E1968.5050309@rcbowen.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:58:32 -0400
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCon community panel
References: <531E007E.30107@rcbowen.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1403101831060.2023@urchin.earth.li>
	<531E0FFB.40103@rcbowen.com>
 <CALhtWkf1HTB-+_TfpKyJEQpVLa9WH5x8vmTgRmscnB60Qkn8jw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALhtWkf1HTB-+_TfpKyJEQpVLa9WH5x8vmTgRmscnB60Qkn8jw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 03/10/2014 03:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't see how you can anticipate anything productive, given the
> number of board members who think that the concept is evil, or, at
> least, counter to their vision of the Apache Way.

I'm pretty sure that's a misconception. I'm also sure that there's a 
middle ground where a compromise can be reached.

>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>> On 03/10/2014 02:36 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>> Do folks think that this will make a good panel discussion (obvious, I
>>>> do), and, if so, who should participate in such a panel? I'd love to see
>>>> someone from the board, and someone from the Cordova PMC. Suggestions as to
>>>> who that should be?
>>>
>>> I'd vote for someone from infra too. My reading of the debate was that
>>> there'd be additional tooling needed to support a community that wanted to
>>> release that fast if they were to still maintain the levels of checking we
>>> want + not burn out trying. A comdev volunteer might round it out as well,
>>> since there were concerns about how volunteers and new community members
>>> would be encouraged + supported to participate if there were lots of "work
>>> hours" community members involved in the fast cadence process.
>>>
>>> As for the board member, do you want a fireworks filled session, a lively
>>> debate, or a quiet but very productive one? ;-)
>>
>> Ideally I'd want something lively and productive. Fireworks might fill seats
>> but ultimately do us no good.
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
>> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>>

-- 
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon