Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C74510323 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 19:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33600 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2014 19:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 33295 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2014 19:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 10109 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2014 19:03:02 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fy4kNjlvMFtDy833iHdR61/a01A4gXUbZSSWm1rdCLM=; b=TiQEc7dabik9Jh4VB8ICoL6pscGF/YqQ6h51L45/1ru/o0T+3CdW6OMIgWImhL+0z0 ZiSWIOsI0yylglDYvAels8yVhLl/bK7uy12yKorsuPquqZE0Fiv0L9ojwCbckX4PMDGV s7spadGKMtBT6bRqdZVLThDgEbDZwYDEBQM0JTWS19/ceqFmULez26Z/TorFyF8Za86F GKrfzV1l9LZDovrSbOPJg4JpRxybFsZrVejkiXOuRaAoYN8iBFcno3cUNzuVfVG6OWma oE/EwQZhD7fi9r//X3wu1gz4lUmw6v2oRXxk2Nc14o7q/S43wJYf0NhSGSiD8vfhtA4w +XMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.35.194 with SMTP id q2mr24307771qcd.7.1391972580252; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 11:03:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 11:03:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How can we support a faster release cadence? From: Doug Cutting To: board Cc: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > * Go and fork the project code on GitHub. > * Put your changes in there and PR them up into the Apache codebase. > * If others want to, they can PR the code to you, and then you can PR the > code up to the codebase (or the group of you could work as a community > preparing PRs). > * The one pushing into the Apache codebase needs to be confident that the > code is covered by CLAs. > * You can release in GitHub whenever you want. > * The Apache release happens less often and follows the rules. Keep in mind that if this is in any way a PMC activity then it is part of Apache trying to circumvent the rest of Apache, i.e., not advised. A distinct legal entity may indeed fork, re-brand, alter and release any Apache project using policies it prefers, but this must be clearly separate from any Apache project. A subset of a PMC acting as individuals would be murky territory if they share no common legal entity outside Apache. Doug