Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 041AF106E4 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8460 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2014 13:48:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 8323 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2014 13:47:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 8315 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2014 13:47:59 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:47:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f179.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username jani, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:47:58 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l4so9186117lbv.24 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:47:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MH4ULin0OupJCWYwJxJw0zlIBzI9J6/MgK9boTWxlkY=; b=ShnazIucuyP/IqcITDWhky1QhveX5tUYfoieZ4cOTloils4YKDVzooCtN1G81kAaeX laLSyZW8PEnUctsB2jE6/SLcJqPblWj+zoCjxo/cvmnVaNdm6YA+5q54CG2RZRwx1LVa QB0CoE8fglM2tFR2BCGHwdOin4eZr2/X3DL/GhzhKYIPxJy25nKtMaE19BwnM+I2qiP5 f8B7V/v6iGjudQAaALzcrmc5EmPiU3uHNUblQ3CzM1/DVzB6gvFD5mFS5nVaY2fThRNY ImNd3AxdZAI8lvhGiIWM8ZIJC+fvMHhFoCQlh78RZuccN+dGanqKoLOsHk+WbzZ+IRUy NWXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.6.199 with SMTP id d7mr5562333laa.22.1392385676577; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.65.10 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 05:47:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FE1CA3.5050706@rcbowen.com> References: <52FD0AAE.5090601@rcbowen.com> <52FE1CA3.5050706@rcbowen.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:47:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ApacheCon Community track From: jan i To: "dev@community.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1d96a4918404f25e0dc7 --089e013d1d96a4918404f25e0dc7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 14 February 2014 14:39, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote: >> >>> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short >>> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and >>> thereby >>> giving for us all. >>> >>> The community track is all about our communities, so why not do some of >>> the >>> talks in that form. >>> >>> but thats just my personal opinion. >>> >> My strong +1 to that -- a panel with a cool moderator is worth a couple >> of presos in my book ;-) >> > > Do you have a specific topic or question that a panel could address? Needs > to be something that there's actually some room for debate, so that it's > not a bunch of "me too". > Take the ongoing discussion about release timing, that will for sure call for debate. Another theme is "do we want to be more visible, thus attracting more sponsors" The latter require a panel of "old" and "new" people. rgds jan I. > > --Rich > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > --089e013d1d96a4918404f25e0dc7--