Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D7D410986 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 07:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85599 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2014 07:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 85266 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2014 07:16:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 85256 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2014 07:16:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 07:16:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.128.182] (HELO mail-ve0-f182.google.com) (209.85.128.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 07:16:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so3562800veb.13 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:15:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vfMejhhO8rZoCRszWzUIAetYFqH562wOpKS1ov592Fg=; b=GwGEK3ppm5tMni8Yo9Gg3bDYKhxdvfMT6X8eTfYVOlVEG+fzqOpRGFLFKVTmRLrCce lcubqGuUle2PV2A2l/bLvcaT7Xc5xf2dgkov22YEUzLuh2QlldJNup7g059FhWpMcMlM LOu/SPWo5vMG5RYgWrKyBu1OyX0ZSMcSkhVHn+vEnjiaCf+k5ZxGQ9WjPbhqqXmEaxfd c6ycsG5W6qXb3bByKjTQLyvvxFx2K7uygGrhDEjQ6Q2qBt/0Cz1LfbYrp+DI2U9L5M/Q ztoigXReC934lPbrbUr4k/ifsYPdNZ6lxBcMNDuQR7z+CXuf+stwKhbbc6XenS5lNOeZ N3EQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZcgDCGXxzwFaxCc27i2QgvxZHqxk0xuz4Gur0Gk8UB4wjqYGcwt4pkG9lb3huDfNQ64pX MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.250.203 with SMTP id mp11mr2814894vcb.2.1391843747987; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.59.11.68 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 23:15:47 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [99.46.94.139] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 23:15:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How can we support a faster release cadence? From: Marvin Humphrey To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > I checked and I think my very original post is reply to dev... Somebody on > the board list pulled it back in I suspect. I didn't get my diagnosis quite right. The copy delivered to dev@community.apache has the following headers: To: dev@community.apache.org Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org The copy delivered to board@apache has the following headers: To: dev@community.apache.org Reply-To: board@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list board@apache.org I'm subscribed to both lists, and Gmail has deduped the two mails into one conversation. I only see the copy of your mail delivered to board@apache, but I see all the replies from both the public and private lists intermingled. I understand the effect you were trying to achieve, but I'm not sure what best practice is. Probably sending to the public list and then forwarding to the private list? In any case, thanks for starting things off with a very nice email! Marvin Humphrey