Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <52EB5EFC.6090608@cord.dk>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:29:48 +0100
From: Daniel Gruno <rumble@cord.dk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: A couple of questions on ApacheCon, Denver reviews...
References: 
 <CAGj3216cz-j2XHpyTV7duO0GCixgEc2b6W=eJz-mwDuji1ucMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ULb+tjt139WiTpo2Vq=mhkYFaQiOkjaCbzB80Sz1Tbd7UGyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CF0FC831.2FAB6%rbowen@rcbowen.com> <CF1074DC.2FB42%rvesse@dotnetrdf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CF1074DC.2FB42%rvesse@dotnetrdf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
> reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
> 
> Rob

As I understand it, speakers cannot see what reviewers write about a
talk, nor can you see what others write about your own talk if you are a
reviewer as well as a (potential) speaker. Rich may be able to clarify
when he gets back to a computer.

With regards,
Daniel.


> 
> On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> 
>> The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate
>> more
>> than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect
>> the
>> opinion of the subject experts.
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - RBowen@rcbowen.com
>>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rvs@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
>>> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
>>> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
>>> the proposal in our given areas or weight them
>>> somehow?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
>>>>
>>>> The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
>>> will
>>>> be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of
>>> reviews?
>>>>
>>>> There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF
>>> presentations
>>>> -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific
>>> Apache
>>>> project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that
>>>> volunteered for reviewing, review them?
>>>>
>>>> Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the
>>>> decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it
>>> might be
>>>> advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers.
>>>>
>>>> ok, that's it for now...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> -----------------
>>>> Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice
>>>>
>>>> "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
>>>>  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
>>>>                                        -- James Mason
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
>