community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>
Subject Re: A couple of questions on ApacheCon, Denver reviews...
Date Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:15:24 GMT
That's my understanding too. It should be easy enough to test this once i'm
not in an airport any more.

-- 
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbowen@rcbowen.com
On Jan 31, 2014 3:30 AM, "Daniel Gruno" <rumble@cord.dk> wrote:

> On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> > Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
> > reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
> >
> > Rob
>
> As I understand it, speakers cannot see what reviewers write about a
> talk, nor can you see what others write about your own talk if you are a
> reviewer as well as a (potential) speaker. Rich may be able to clarify
> when he gets back to a computer.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
> >
> > On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate
> >> more
> >> than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect
> >> the
> >> opinion of the subject experts.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rich Bowen - RBowen@rcbowen.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rvs@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
> >>> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
> >>> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
> >>> the proposal in our given areas or weight them
> >>> somehow?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Roman.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
> >>>>
> >>>> The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
> >>> will
> >>>> be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of
> >>> reviews?
> >>>>
> >>>> There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF
> >>> presentations
> >>>> -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific
> >>> Apache
> >>>> project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that
> >>>> volunteered for reviewing, review them?
> >>>>
> >>>> Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the
> >>>> decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it
> >>> might be
> >>>> advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers.
> >>>>
> >>>> ok, that's it for now...
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------
> >> -----------------
> >>>> Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice
> >>>>
> >>>> "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
> >>>>  for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
> >>>>                                        -- James Mason
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message