community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Subject Re: Question about Apache-Extras
Date Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:43:05 GMT
Hi,

OFBiz is concerned as well. We have several components there and we would like to know if
a replacement solution has been planned?

https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/search?q=label%3aOFBiz

Thanks

Jacques

On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:58 PM luckbr1975@gmail.com wrote
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org>wrote:
>> 
>>> On 28/10/2013 Roger Whitcomb wrote:
>>> 
>>>> P.S. Apache OpenOffice are also concerned, so I have copied them as well.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks. As stated in last July's OpenOffice Board Report:
>>>   ---
>>> OpenOffice, like the ASF as a whole, is hit by the announced policy
>>> change of Apache Extras. The project currently stores several libraries
>>> there, in an area known as ooo-extras, and the build process downloads
>>> them when options like --enable-category-b are used. A solution should
>>> be found at the ASF level.
>>>   ---
>>> 
>>> So basically I have the same questions as Roger:
>>> 1) does the Google Code change affect Apache Extras (I was assuming it
>>> does)?
>>> 2) Are there plans to make the lost functionality available in some other
>>> ways?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>>   Andrea.
>>> 
>> 
>> I either missed or haven't received the announced policy change. Could
>> someone please provide a copy.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> 
> I just found the blog post with the announcement, let me look into it.

Mime
View raw message