community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rich Bowen <>
Subject Re: Content Committee, ApacheCon 2014
Date Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:41:22 GMT
It's in svn, however it's in the Foundation repo, which is member-only, 
as there's foundation-confidential info in there as well. If you have a 
suggestion of somewhere public we might put this, please speak up, and 
we can copy it there.

Regarding the actual CFP and resulting talk submissions, that will be 
handled on the producer's website, in a CFP web app specifically for the 


On 12/17/2013 10:01 AM, Christian Posta wrote:
> Maybe someone can volunteer to set up a wiki were we can track all of
> this? I'm not sure what would be the best place... that way we don't
> need to reply all :)
> and in that wiki, I can volunteer to curate the content for ActiveMQ project :)
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <> wrote:
>> I should have some spare cycles starting next year, so you have a volunteer.
>> Cos
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:52PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> Dear PMCs,
>>> In the coming days, we'll be hearing more about ApacheCon 2014, and what
>>> we need to do to make it happen.
>>> This time around, we, the folks at the ASF, will be responsible for
>>> selecting content, while the conference producer will be responsible for
>>> *EVERYTHING* else.
>>> Content selection is no small task, and I need help. While there are
>>> several people who have already volunteered to be part of a content
>>> selection committee, I'd also like to ask each PMC which wants to be
>>> represented in the selection process to volunteer one person to
>>> represent them in this task.
>>> We'll be using the RFP infrastructure supplied by the producer so all
>>> you'd be on the hook for is being willing to review a list of talk
>>> proposals specific to your project, and voting for/against them in some
>>> method which that RFP process provides. Final schedule construction
>>> falls to the producer, and, I suppose, to me.
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> Rich Bowen

Rich Bowen

View raw message