community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Curcuru <>
Subject Re: Process, policy and best practice
Date Mon, 01 Apr 2013 21:20:35 GMT

On 4/1/2013 2:19 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ross Gardler <>wrote:
>> On 1 Apr 2013 18:28, "Luciano Resende" <> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Ross Gardler <
>>> wrote:
>>>> Since then the IPMC has been discussing the idea of handing off the
>>>> documentation parts of their responsibilities to ComDev. This is just a
>>>> discussion item and is in no way a decision at this point.
>>>> The idea, as I understand it, is not to pass over any of the podling
>>>> oversight responsibilities, only the documentation of ASF policies,
>>>> processes and best practice.
> If the budget is not a pre-requisite, how do envision a small PMC like
> ComDev, taking responsibility of a big task, that the current owner and a
> much larger PMC has not been able to handle ?

Luciano has an excellent point in that there's not much to discuss until 
ComDev sees some clarity on what is being asked.

I do however think this could be an excellent idea, precisely in part 
because ComDev is smaller and more focused.  I could imagine ComDev 
changing it's scope to effectively serve as an information shepherd on 
all of the* content focused on our technical communities. 
I.e. not only serving as owners of community.a.o, where we have friendly 
overviews and pointers to other info, but also editorial owners of 
things like /dev.  This doesn't mean setting policy for technical 
matters or svn instructions - this more would mean (I'm imagining) 
taking responsibility for making the technical information there more 
understandable and better organized.

The issue with the IPMC and the Incubator is multi-fold:

- Operations.  Overseeing podlings and voting in new ones, graduating 
ones, etc.  This is *not* anything to do with ComDev.

- Policy setting.  This is the IPMC (or other relevant ASF officers) 
setting official minimum required policy for the incubation process. 
This is *not* anything to do with ComDev.

- Explaining to the world what the Incubation policies are and guiding 
newcomers through how IPMC Operations work.  This one bit is something 
that ComDev *might* be able to help with, if I'm seeing what Ross is 
getting at.

Personally, I find the incubator site maddening in terms of explaining 
to a normal human what the heck to do.  There's a chance that if ComDev 
wanted to help, people here could make significant improvements merely 
by better explaining the incubator - without having to make policy or 
podling decisions.

That in particular is something that could make use of a hired technical 
writer, if separately we thought that spending was warranted.

Make sense?

- Shane

View raw message