Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6667E62F for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 01:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36493 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2013 01:47:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 36235 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2013 01:47:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 36226 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2013 01:47:26 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:47:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.0.1.5]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username smarru, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:47:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: GSoC 2013: non-code projects on website, branding? From: Suresh Marru In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 20:47:23 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6DA7FA2E-9A2E-4B77-A57F-9632CEB22D64@apache.org> References: <51324706.6010604@shanecurcuru.org> To: dev@community.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) On Mar 2, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Ross Gardler = wrote: > On 2 March 2013 10:37, Shane Curcuru wrote: >=20 >> Quick sanity check: would it be worthwhile to explore having a = non-code >> project? >=20 >=20 > Google have always, in the past, been against non-code projects in = GSoC. >=20 > Assuming this has not changed, your ideas are better suited to the = other > initiative which is more high school level (I forget its name) but it = runs > later in the year and projects are discreet and less code focussed. = We've > not participated in that programme for a good few years but that's = only > been due to lack of someone to drive our engagement. Is it Google Code-in [1] ? Documentation seems to rightly fit here.=20 Suresh [1] - https://developers.google.com/open-source/gci/2012/ >=20 > Ross >=20 >=20 >=20 >> We often decry the lack of understandable or organized technical >> documentation, especially on the apache.org site. Similarly, we = could do >> a much better job simply clearly describing things for branding, = making >> fundraising look a little prettier, having an easier to navigate = events >> area, etc. >>=20 >> Should I try to find enough discrete tasks here to submit a >> documentation-type GSoC idea? Or is that not likely to find any = students / >> going to be too much work to pull together? >>=20 >> I love the idea of offering a non-heavy-code project, and I will have = a >> little spare time over the summer (when I'm taking a 12 week leave of >> absence from $dayjob). >>=20 >> Ideas? Anyone want to help? >>=20 >> - Shane >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com