community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ulrich Stärk <...@spielviel.de>
Subject Re: Some clarification needed for Apache Extra projects - Apache Extra in specific
Date Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:38:02 GMT
On 27.09.2012 12:34, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 27 September 2012 11:01, "Ulrich Stärk" <uli@spielviel.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, September 27, 2012 11:24, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> On 27 September 2012 10:17, "Ulrich Stärk" <uli@spielviel.de> wrote:
>>>> So an additional binary package including e.g. your Hibernate
>>>> integration
>>>> and a separate location in SVN/GIT where users can get the sources are
>>>> OK
>>>> IMO as long as both are not part of your official source distribution.
>>>
>>> This is not correct. The ASF does not maintain code under incompatible
>>> licenses.
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>
>> Were did I say that? I'm talking about code depending on software with
>> incompatible licenses, such as a Hibernate integration.
> 
> If you didn't mean a separate SVN/Git repo on ASF hardware then you
> didn't say it and I misunderstood.

I said "separate location in SVN/GIT" and meant a separate folder or whatever but not a separate
repo.

> 
> The code in question, at
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/ is under the
> GPL. The questions, as I read them, can be paraphrased as "can we
> develop GPL code using ASF infrastructure for everything else", from a
> community perspective I would say the answer is no (which you seem to
> agree with). I don't believe the question is about being legal able to
> use the code, the PMC is already using it.
> 
> Ross
> 

So everyone agrees. Great ;)

Uli


Mime
View raw message