community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mehdi houshmand <med1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GSoC Mentor vetting procedure
Date Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:51:18 GMT
Sorry, I'm some what unclear as to the vetting procedure, it doesn't
seem to be documented anywhere. Also, aside from our subscription
being accepted to code-awards@, is the list of accepted mentors
documented anywhere?

Thanks,

Mehdi

On 18 March 2012 07:31, Ulrich Stärk <uli@spielviel.de> wrote:
> I'm OK with that, I'm just recapitulating what we discussed after last year's incident.
Assuming
> lazy concensus. we'll invite pmc@a.o to begin applying as mentors in 72 hours, no changes
to the
> mentor vetting procedure.
>
> Uli
>
> On 18.03.2012 04:59, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Tammo van Lessen <tvanlessen@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> Hi Ulrich,
>>>>
>>>> I applied as mentor for Apache ODE and I'm the PMC chair of ODE. Does
>>>> that mean I have to ACK (or not NACK) myself? Or do I need to let the
>>>> others PMC members vote for me mentoring a project? Sounds a bit
>>>> cumbersome to me.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>  Tammo
>>>>
>>> I agree with Tammo. The old process has been working ok for several
>>> years (with the exception of one incident last year).  I'd rather
>>> continue with the process (and maybe avoid any temporary account
>>> creation at apache)., and deal with issues when we find them. Anyway,
>>> just my 0.2c...
>> +1 In my POV better to continue with old process and address any
>> issues once they occur.
>>
>> Thanks !
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luciano Resende
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message