Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AB6F719F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92676 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2011 21:06:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 92481 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2011 21:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 92468 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2011 21:06:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:06:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.106] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:06:40 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id pBTL6GZn014526 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:06:17 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.83]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.72]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:06:16 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "dev@community.apache.org" CC: Mark Struberg , "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:08:49 -0800 Subject: Re: Apache Extras Question Thread-Topic: Apache Extras Question Thread-Index: AczGbbOXqNytoomITTuc/9ki7Hk1pg== Message-ID: <9109DB37-09B8-436F-9B88-60941FD08702@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <15F56445-F5E3-4EBB-BAE4-71A7B973F294@jpl.nasa.gov> <983E76DE-3218-482D-B978-C1BD72A212B1@jpl.nasa.gov> <1325190214.13347.YahooMailNeo@web27804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <33FA66EA-4508-4D8A-963F-B3ED1088CD1C@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Christian, On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> [...snip...] >>=20 >> To avoid that nuclear option, I proposed 2 concrete suggestions and even= volunteered >> to work up a patch that implements the one with less sweeping change. IO= W, I >> offered to put my money where my mouth was and do the work to update the= docs. >>=20 >> Sound good? >=20 > For me yes, but I am just a lurker on this list. But are you sure this > issue is apache-extras related? It boils down to: are other people > allowed to use the org.apache namespace or not. Yeah I know there is a larger question here -- one in which I'm trying to avoid b/c I'm simply trying to solve my smaller question :-) > Maybe this is > trademark related? If others are not allowed, then many projects must > rename their spaces. if others are allowed, then there can not be such > a policy as "do not use org.a namespace" for apache-extras. My guess is that the ASF has neither the resources, nor the energy,=20 nor the time to desire to police everyone's forks of Apache projects on Github, etc., that leverage the org.apache.* namespace (which there are plenty, even enabled by the ASF's own mirroring of our project's=20 at Github). By precedent, I'm inclined to agree with you and state that we already allow this. I could have just gone about my business, given this assumption, but I came to this list to try and be a good ASF citizen and member and state that I think stuff like this should be find. And further, I'm going to state that I didn't go to Github first, which is= =20 *totally* not associated with the ASF at all. I went to our supposed "Extras" site which I'm learning is not that at all.=20 I'd like to make it "that" however and stated 2 proposals for getting there= . I'm inclined to go with my 2nd proposal, and simply update the docs on the FAQ to state that if the PMC is OK with a situation that is outside = of 3.1 and 3.2, then there should be a VOTE/recorded result on the=20 mailing list by the PMC, and then that's an exception (documented) to the standard rule. >=20 > Probably you should include Shane too? CC'ing trademarks and pointing them to [1] for the full conversation history. Cheers, Chris [1] http://s.apache.org/EZ7 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++