Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aOGTOgIF8vlvLMiRfXTujJA8EMntpvkUGLOFTNcnk44CScuz7NDd+aemq4OYzInBqs
         2PlIDKkQcWte+WzYaMZUXRK4mpCBYrX1wlk3wnjYuKwxljffbT8+qGcvBzCBuvtOTkAx
         8ZTb5WH79zOT50dzTCIXwzwnkalW95vInA2fo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8C87C259-6282-40C3-8C18-B063E73F4C47@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=eRmthBzhqwJ--8S9Vo-S5SV1EYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1105121504490.29085@urchin.earth.li>
	<4DCBF2D1.1090000@apache.org>
	<BANLkTi=UodMeYtKSpvNf4ZW1=Qq1Ck9L0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DCC36CD.2000403@apache.org>
	<BANLkTiknZcTPdzkdvzESQFK21nNRXck=ig@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DCC4BC0.3040005@apache.org>
	<BANLkTim2KF-MJn1WRdTJqLd8kSYgGbw+kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DCC620D.4030105@apache.org>
	<BANLkTi=KZLVhD_BWNjtd9oMD6rggFyxWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8C87C259-6282-40C3-8C18-B063E73F4C47@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:56:23 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTik-LFkP6X6wS9kTe998CT3LJ0w2-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stackoverflow
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: dev@community.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don't think it's the tagging and voting. It's the ease of finding
and tracking unanswered questions.

When someone posts a message to one of the busy user(s)@ lists, they
have only so much chance of snagging the attention of someone
qualified to answer. If they get lost in the wash, the question is
probably lost for good.

Some very lightweight system for allowing users to open 'tickets'
asking for some sort of specific assistance might help here. Or it,
too, might wash away in the tide.


On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:47 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>
> On May 12, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> The QA format, in my opinion, is a very powerful tool for some kinds
>> of collaborative assistance, and a completely useless tool for others.
>> It's much easier to find a question with answers than to find a
>> mailing list thread. It's on the other hand pretty silly to engage in
>> any sort of extended interactive assistance on it.
>
> That's been my experience as well. =C2=A0The QA format is pretty great fo=
r some stuff, but breaks down fast when I have to ask for log files and thi=
ngs of that nature.
>
> Another thought. =C2=A0Sometimes I wonder how hard it would be to just al=
low tagging and voting on top of a plain mailing list emails. =C2=A0A simpl=
e DB with the messageId as the key for tags and vote count then a slightly =
fancier archive view than we have now. =C2=A0 And hey, markdown happens to =
look nice as plain email. =C2=A0I've actually been indenting code snippets =
for years.
>
> I admit I like getting SO points and badges but they do not factor in at =
all when looking for the right answer.
>
> The tags and votes though are definitely the two critical tools that help=
 me find what i'm looking for.
>
>
> -David
>
>