Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11537 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2011 06:49:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2011 06:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 60949 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 06:49:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 60804 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 06:49:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 60796 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2011 06:49:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:49:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gert.vanthienen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.42] (HELO mail-bw0-f42.google.com) (209.85.214.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:48:56 +0000 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so962156bwz.29 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:48:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=M1rRM3JcDIX4sp5b68uuxks6SCHtQnQF/yUuSCpT/lI=; b=czZFqFxRJq+Bco0ioLyTkp30hmHhT0ait0dQ0ugemH7vWXOgelZJOxGnWg8Xj3fBqg 69hydnCOFfPc39BNPFx4ik+DAbQcWGoHBmeBAL0e1Bs/WvdUE71UgiVU26zxsAP3lbBw Jc4kljeEewAxl3GciCp0YlP4NY+jX+j6M/P1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NdIbFU7hrw1E9ftt07YX0VHj3vF16mUsSm9TAGAQHkrnyjWRh5gbUX//UhmjVOBT3T c6hUAgqkDCr5Fm+qPLOyVMd4YdidCxVLWVFpg8NCXAAB7ikVos+H16/clya+8cXF+D1Z PLA0kHwjoNEk7bBORvAAGRISEYJBCho2EFV04= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.7.3 with SMTP id b3mr471101bkb.160.1302072516495; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.123.14 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: FAQ for apache-extras.org From: Gert Vanthienen To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org L.S., In the FAQ at apache-extras.org ( http://community.apache.org/apache-extras/guidelines.html ) it says "Therefore, we require project owners to respect the Apache Software Foundation trademark policy, including 1) not using Apache or an existing Apache project name in your Apache Extras project name, and 2) not using org.apache as the prefix for your bundle or package name. " While creating a project called servicemix-extra, this was seemingly in violation with part 1) because we do in include ServiceMix in the Apache Extras project name. Since there are already a lot of projects out there that have the same naming convention, I suspect the FAQ entry should read something like... "Therefore, we require project owners to respect the Apache Software Foundation trademark policy, including 1) not using Apache in your Apache Extras project name, 2) not using an existing Apache project name as your Apache Extras project name, and 3) not using org.apache as the prefix for your bundle or package name. " Is this the correct interpretation of the given FAQ entry? If so, shouldn't we update the entry to avoid confusing simple souls like myself? Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/