Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:35:11 +0300
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org>
Cc: trademarks@apache.org, dev@community.apache.org,
	Gert Vanthienen <gert.Vanthienen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FAQ for apache-extras.org
Message-ID: <20110406153511.GA22138@daniel3.local>
References: <BANLkTi=NXzKtoHWmhHBivD0N4-R3ZLpDuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D9C7332.3060409@apache.org>
 <4D9C7ACC.2010504@shanecurcuru.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D9C7ACC.2010504@shanecurcuru.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Shane Curcuru wrote on Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:38:04 -0400:
> Given the fact that in this case, we already know the people running
> the project, and the fact that we exercise some control over the
> apache-extras.org domain and hosting itself, I'd feel comfortable in
> having a much more liberal "licensing" policy for projects at Apache
> Extras.

IANL, but did you put the word "licensing" in quotes?