community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anjana G Bhattacharjee <a.g.bhattachar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Contributing positively to a meritocracy (was Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] roll women@a.o into dev@community.a.o)
Date Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:40:27 GMT
Hi Ted,

Thanks for being willing to cc your reply to women@ - guess you got the same
response to that one too, eh ?

Now, who do you figure it was that had been willing to perform that
operation ? And with what manner of sentiment ? And do such things matter
for a next time around, for a next possible circumstance ?

Best, A

PS - You originally scored a whole-in-one at the 9th with your first
response to the proposal, so you've already made the cut - how positively
sublime ;-)


On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Process comes after somebody willing to perform the process.
>
> -1 to the proposed womAn mailing list.
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Anjana G Bhattacharjee <
> a.g.bhattacharjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > as ever, my focus here is on process
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message