Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59843 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 08:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 08:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 52330 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 08:01:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 52229 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 08:01:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 52221 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 08:01:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:01:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1405.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:01:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 59754 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 08:00:47 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gw0-f42.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:00:47 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1484279gwb.29 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:00:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.53.30 with SMTP id b30mr5455521ana.188.1274688046012; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.3.7 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:00:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BF9B340.2050109@apache.org> References: <4BF9B340.2050109@apache.org> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:00:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What are the basic, invariant rules of Apache projects? From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 23/05/2010 16:24, Nick Burch wrote: >> ...Inspired by your idea, I've sat down and written a blog post about the >> CLAs and release votes, trying to cover the Why rather than the What: >> http://gagravarr.livejournal.com/140493.html >> >> Corrections gratefully received, otherwise do feel free to pinch bits >> for a foundation post if it looks useful :) > > Why not just post it to the foundation (or comdev) blog? I'm sure we can > review it properly for you.... I'd say comdev, as we seem to have some momentum to start this. -Bertrand (traveling this week, might take a few days to finalize my post)