Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPUUeom8K+AfFRo6vtydefybG53TYLFUmKpqZs89SqR0RTViYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9fUpZcv1uBsWrcYmM7P-GtMbW6eULFoDfPPGLh6Gjq1gMHUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPUUeom8K+AfFRo6vtydefybG53TYLFUmKpqZs89SqR0RTViYg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:36:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH9fUpbu_zRJCKu9hEhT=uaca=e1vag8TenQv2SAV4VfMU3BaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: commons-lang3: Too early to deprecate RandomStringUtils in favor
 of RandomStringGenerator ?
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0595028cef0305584ac16d"
archived-at: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 15:36:32 -0000

--94eb2c0595028cef0305584ac16d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Again,
What is the expected schedule for this plan ?
Will it be available in commons-text-1.2 ?

Thanks

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjadiye@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Philippe,
>
> Looking at similar kind of demand we are thinking to execute below plan, I
> think it will be good for your expectations.
>
> http://markmail.org/message/azxw4nai7fs2laas
>
> Regards,
> Amey
>
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Philippe Mouawad <pmouawad@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > Since version 3.6 of commons-lang3, RandomStringUtils has been deprecated
> > following introduction of commons-text.
> >
> > Looking at current 1.1 version (and even snapshot 1.2) I wonder if it's
> not
> > too early for deprecation.
> >
> > RandomStringUtils was very simple and intuitive to use. I don't remember
> I
> > ever had to think when using it :-)
> >
> > RandomStringGenerator is nice in terms of API and much more powerful for
> > advanced usage, but it looks to me much more complex to use for simple,
> > average cases:
> >
> >    - RandomStringUtils.random ? => Is this the equivalent
> >    - new RandomStringGenerator.Builder()
> >                   .filteredBy(CharacterPredicates.LETTERS)
> >                   .build();
> >       - I don't get exactly the same results ? Is it due to Unicode
> chars ?
> >       - RandomStringUtils.randomAlphabetic(count) => new
> >    RandomStringGenerator.Builder()
> >                .withinRange('0', 'z')
> >                .filteredBy(CharacterPredicates.LETTERS,
> >    CharacterPredicates.DIGITS)
> >                .build().generate(count)
> >
> > What about use cases when count and source chars are configurable :
> >
> >    - RandomStringUtils.random(count, chars)
> >    - => Are we supposed to build each time the generator ?
> >
> > Is it as efficient in terms of CPU and memory usage as RandomStringUtils
> > equivalent ?
> >
> > Sorry if my questions are stupid.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

--94eb2c0595028cef0305584ac16d--