commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [CSV] CSVMutableRecord
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2017 00:54:09 GMT
Feel free to provide a PR on GitHub :-)

Gary

On Aug 14, 2017 15:29, "Gary Gregory" <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we've kept the design as YAGNI as possible... :-)
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:25 PM, nitin mahendru <
> nitin.mahendru88@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah that also is OK. I though there is a reason to keep the CSVRecord
>> without setters. But maybe not!
>>
>> Nitin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:22 PM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > Should we consider adding put(int,Object) and put(String, Object) to the
>> > current CSVRecord class?
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:54 PM, nitin mahendru <
>> > nitin.mahendru88@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I recently pushed a change(pull request 20) to get the line ending
>> from
>> > the
>> > > parser.
>> > >
>> > > Now I want to push another change which I feel will also be useful for
>> > the
>> > > community. I want to add a CSVRecordMutable class which had a
>> constructor
>> > > which accepts a CSVRecord object. So when we have a CSVRecordMutable
>> > object
>> > > from it then we can edit individual columns using it.
>> > >
>> > > I would be using this to write back my edited CSV file. My use case
>> is to
>> > > read a csv, mangle some columns, write back a new csv.
>> > >
>> > > I could have directly raised a pull request but I just wanted to float
>> > the
>> > > idea before and see the reaction.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Nitin
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message