Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC78610EB4 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92193 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2014 15:46:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91233 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2014 15:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91064 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2014 15:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthew@jaggard.org.uk designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:46:22 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq11so6058129vcb.0 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:46:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jaggard.org.uk; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=v1aUGMLIH7Q+nzzc+IbD1x7is4lXPYbrNqimYo+qSJ4=; b=BDqbjvV5yQDB1OlQhnmqdiug3HvowIcGYdIYw0id3S+PnzjMJppOHD/+xpoZ1t9hJq IrvBFNEVQqGBO+YlLubvykPs4XpL5vnLTNAFEunnNNs/lVEltYkk1k4Up54ncJcjdWfM M2pGTIZNs927JnMgq8f6KqT2HeD/dXVMqv9K8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v1aUGMLIH7Q+nzzc+IbD1x7is4lXPYbrNqimYo+qSJ4=; b=lgG/Og+4rfSgSWR86tBVd15PxUcreGmBA+xVpyNBv/CXtKqgmtnIAXiPfguJN7iy3W gf1rljyvY1k0jNrIYjWs6YyBBlIDcYbTWGI2r1MqP+AwJNZ2qsu9JV+u6915viE1B/nb FirtDjmSyqhshA5aHl+4mWVJIxGP9FwfvTW/UJJm0rZyHEstTQgyfPcDsREdHkCm5e/V vJGKvZHifj+/EWFfKlho9nf94T7nS4ZQKMlOnmWKmoppMZpBC7QmnJ1eVpiPH+8F2fXh JxjygyK4QY0LMtFhrnrCSiLzWarbqta3vlUPl1JZN2pijRtIaVAVk+VHJ2I+Jew0x0NB 8AuA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmbRWCREO9S95MdNS43/1Q3LAwTcysGiVw8vxLs0G/3eTYe3WGBt0QYVlUv8wzCwyayzrYi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.166.9 with SMTP id zc9mr27975993vdb.16.1391528761218; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:46:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.50.226 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:46:01 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [213.152.60.17] In-Reply-To: <8x2bn43lcftmc3m655v0dint.1391526968801@email.android.com> References: <8x2bn43lcftmc3m655v0dint.1391526968801@email.android.com> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:46:01 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [JCS] Version 2 release From: Mat Jaggard To: Commons Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d99281ee0604f1968923 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2d99281ee0604f1968923 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I can't actually see any relevant issues in JIRA. They all seem to either relate to 1.3, be improvements rather than bugs or be an issue with Maven testing rather than the product. Are there any blocking issues or is it just testing time that's preventing 2.0 being released? On 4 February 2014 15:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > I do not think we have a schedule for 2.0. If you want to help push it > out, I suggest you go through the Jira issues and see what you Figo should > be addressed. You can post your ideas here. If you want to provide > patches, make sure you patch trunk and attach different files to Jira > issues. > > Gary > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Mat Jaggard > Date:02/04/2014 06:16 (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Users List > Subject: [JCS] Version 2 release > > Hi, > Can you tell me when version 2.0 of JCS is likely to be released? What are > the blocking issues? Is there anything I can do to help? > > The main problem for me is using concurrent instead of the Java 5 > equivalent. > > Many thanks, > Mat. > --001a11c2d99281ee0604f1968923--