Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6064E10C5A for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22906 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2013 14:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 22501 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2013 14:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 22493 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2013 14:04:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.182] (HELO mail-gg0-f182.google.com) (209.85.161.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:04:21 +0000 Received: by mail-gg0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f1so1378322ggn.27 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=dLZUXjqqEU57OAq9Her72DNf6Fctc/d1IhF4d7AlKg0=; b=k0WUGEBVMmSUW6bnNAGb3gCNV3w8I6DSbB8I5AEBvyH4TRXfRLfaMDaLZ2mA1HW0+X prvYPHLw/ibQmrTqBgP2bkG+SGKcPpWDwc0rDGMuRUT08ZL6LkY1xZEM6KbdtGn/XL6U 9EA71XrM0ElROe/TQAZ37BgupCUmtiMEXo1ynzv8QkLpw0g5hWvzb+diPIr3w9KjsMJw aMSV18acvZnVI59Tb0b1qvG9y24nXannGuA/rwtj28J+II1a6yWXKy/3KeSzQy8OBmp7 Nl/spqD5FrVEEuSNhP5haiSnDQFILsEgqi12T1ZKAFePRfr5bGcxpaBUyqLYccP4S3P7 FNqQ== X-Received: by 10.236.199.77 with SMTP id w53mr24840598yhn.126.1375020219853; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (74-140-89-150.dhcp.insightbb.com. [74.140.89.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 66sm77583980yhe.20.2013.07.28.07.03.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:03:38 -0700 (PDT) From: James Carman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [proxy] Remove Remoting Providers in 2.x... Message-Id: Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:03:38 -0400 To: "user@commons.apache.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlM2fkxxQL3R439WzIw8JJGI34xNgqaMI0eCLk3raH9UJepYAg+iVcwdQaqaeEgvrNHB/J3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, I would doubt the remoting providers are really used by anyone, but we = should probably ask before removing them. We currently support the = following remoting protocols: - Burlap - Hessian - Jax-RPC - RMI - Session Beans Are there any objections to removing them? These technologies are = somewhat outdated. Thanks, James --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org