Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CAEECAF1 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72935 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 11:14:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 72858 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 11:14:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 72849 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2013 11:14:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.50] (HELO mail-la0-f50.google.com) (209.85.215.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:14:16 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ep20so3910608lab.9 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:13:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=tVCKSbe8nxvVCgVT9xX7nX2mfdVBiX3QwBHwsJMAiWQ=; b=gG3Jxr2/HRqcs7q/8UsQ2ikgKa4khvL8rd5al/DVVTIEEWTk/Q+KIEE8Ygyq/QxzP8 EcLAxdmbQIz86wtbGx4u1keaJgFavyQ4c6+k0d58Vh8i+6hOSIq7XBBAHRBxx9yPbl0C EWYHMzwzHUr9boVmmJCygcFj6mGVzAM0OEdIIs6P8lnlqV+RJYbaXo5GZ56iC258dV++ htITjVIYPOHzwfjovXAScdK2Y3jg8uFv1G9MAH3I2bi+W8wXmhJK/+BaIyXmsEVbUB7S V+dXIRNSanSORbN7cF9D/gYwS7KdO9dd5auGpMYhe1j4quf/GLgVKQcoI+pwQHscDaFb Pheg== X-Received: by 10.112.11.84 with SMTP id o20mr25402819lbb.86.1375096415012; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:13:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com Received: by 10.112.134.138 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:13:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Carman Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:13:14 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SM2Wnkaky-aB27LHlbVpC3u5KaA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [proxy] Remove Remoting Providers in 2.x... To: Commons Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbhkx6fiuQ8SZfnAfcSUMbKitY9YMJpfkMvGNfj568ORBlM/56nEgxERp4MOjU4X/rvT8I X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, I wanted a broader audience, since it would impact users (if there are any). On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi James, > > I guess this was supposed to go to the dev ML? > > Benedikt > > > 2013/7/28 James Carman > >> All, >> >> I would doubt the remoting providers are really used by anyone, but we >> should probably ask before removing them. We currently support the >> following remoting protocols: >> >> - Burlap >> - Hessian >> - Jax-RPC >> - RMI >> - Session Beans >> >> Are there any objections to removing them? These technologies are >> somewhat outdated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> James >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org