Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALznzY6Y40UWmzKKHh0NqAK3mzk4A7d0cozhxH+iVNzmHcaS8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F1DDABC9-1C2D-4B4C-8FC7-555179503AB3@savoirtech.com>
	<CAB917R+yS5S3cBhqnetWEGZx959RXj77KYXuPo6Os9Uz=RVZvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY7EZxJeZt1Eiv5bSispQi7Em_jRrxczoGwKJyAGnd3O_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB917RLFLMu=GEa3BAdhJ6XiRGqDOcpt+_p3eR8KYg0nYpjqFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY6Y40UWmzKKHh0NqAK3mzk4A7d0cozhxH+iVNzmHcaS8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:23:12 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9L6G3+PGE56xdBkqd0SPcnuhQGnFZBJvZ16f-HE+mKugeO9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [proxy] Remove Remoting Providers in 2.x...
From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6704cd5d7c0e04e2a58eb0

--047d7b6704cd5d7c0e04e2a58eb0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Guilty ;-)
On Jul 29, 2013 6:26 AM, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> I did not intent to send it twice at all! :)  I actually sent it from
> two different accounts.  It didn't go through the first time, because
> the first account is not registered (someone must have moderated it
> through, though).
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Okay so you intended to send it to the dev ML and the user ML once?
> Because
> > it appears that you've send it to the user ML twice instead ;-)
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/29 James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
> >
> >> Well, I wanted a broader audience, since it would impact users (if
> >> there are any).
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi James,
> >> >
> >> > I guess this was supposed to go to the dev ML?
> >> >
> >> > Benedikt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/7/28 James Carman <jcarman@savoirtech.com>
> >> >
> >> >> All,
> >> >>
> >> >> I would doubt the remoting providers are really used by anyone, but
> we
> >> >> should probably ask before removing them.  We currently support the
> >> >> following remoting protocols:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Burlap
> >> >> - Hessian
> >> >> - Jax-RPC
> >> >> - RMI
> >> >> - Session Beans
> >> >>
> >> >> Are there any objections to removing them?  These technologies are
> >> >> somewhat outdated.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> James
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> >> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> >> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >> > http://github.com/britter
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--047d7b6704cd5d7c0e04e2a58eb0--