Le 16/03/2012 18:39, Ted Dunning a écrit :
> If you really must do this, use a solver and feed it the identity matrix.
> That is, given the matrix A, solve the matrix system AX = I
>
> Any solver that handles complex matrix right hand sides will do this for
> you. Iterative calls to a solver with successive columns of I can also be
> used to fill in columns of X.
In this case, you can create a FiledMatrix using
MatrixUtils.createFildMatrix factory method (or just use a constructor
of the field matrix class you prefer). Then use
FieldLUDecomposition to get the solver.
>
> But I strongly recommend you rethink the approach. There are very few
> cases were inverting a matrix is a good idea.
I strongly agree with Ted here, direct inversion is often not the better
approach.
Luc
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:01 AM, petitout wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First, congratulations for all your work !
>>
>> I would like to know if there is a mean to inverse a matrix containing
>> complex numbers using you library ?
>> If not, do you know if it will be availble in a future release ?
>> If not, do you know how can I do ?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julien
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org