commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <>
Subject Re: [jexl] Build for 2.1?
Date Sat, 26 Nov 2011 02:57:58 GMT
Hi Max:

I pushed a trunk build to the snapshot repository:

This is straight from trunk, I make no guarantees as to what the next
release will hold compared to what is in trunk today.

Good luck!


*From:* Max Tardiveau []
*Sent:* Friday, November 25, 2011 19:58 PM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Subject:* Re: [jexl] Build for 2.1?

Hi Gary,

the code looks good from here -- all the tests run, and the new
functionality we need the most (JexlEngine.getVariables(Script script) )
seems to work fine. But I realize there may be more to it than that.

A snapshot build would indeed be helpful, if that's not too much work for
you. We'd rather not ship our own "special" jexl jar if possible.


-- Max


*From:* Gary Gregory <>
*To:* Commons Users List <>; Max Tardiveau <>
*Cc:* "" <>
*Sent:* Friday, November 25, 2011 3:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [jexl] Build for 2.1?

I'm not sure what state the trunk code is in, but I am sure we could push a
snapshot build to Maven. Would that help you in the short term until the
next release?


On Nov 25, 2011, at 18:44, "Max Tardiveau" <> wrote:

> It looks like 2.0.1 is still the latest version available in e.g. Maven
repositories and the Jexl project page. Are there any plans to make 2.1
available? We're building it ourselves right now, but it would be nice to
just use a pre-built jar (especially in Maven).
> The reason I'm asking is that we need some new features that were added
recently, namely JexlEngine.getVariables(Script script) and the "x in (1,
2, 3)" syntax.
> Thanks,
> -- Max

E-Mail: |
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed:
Spring Batch in Action:
Tweet! <>

E-Mail: |
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>
Spring Batch in Action: <>

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message