Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D53387B36 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54693 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2011 11:57:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 54319 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2011 11:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 53640 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2011 11:57:18 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:57:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO fc14x86v0.jboss.hr) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mturk, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:57:17 +0000 Message-ID: <4E29659C.2030703@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:57:16 +0200 From: Mladen Turk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: [daemon] References: <4E204F13.8060400@apache.org> <4E2406AC.60201@apache.org> <4E245112.7060703@apache.org> <4E255FD1.2010309@apache.org> <4E280DD0.3070409@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/22/2011 10:34 AM, Hans Rupp wrote: > 2011/7/21 Mladen Turk >> >> So i should have two jvm's, one running my non-gui stuff > as a windows service and one running the gui as a windows > task right? And this two should communicate via IPC > e.g tcp/ip right? Yes. > But isn't that a lot of overhead if i can have it all running in one jvm > without IPC? Sure it is. Same thing you would need on unixes since day 0. > Can please explain why one shouldn't use a service with a gui ? Sorry but i > still don't understand that point. > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb203962%28v=vs.85%29.aspx See the section about Session 0 Isolation I know, I know ... You are developing a new application targeted exclusively for XP which won't work on any contemporary windoze ;) Lets not continue this discussion further because its getting off-topic. Regards -- ^TM --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org