Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of GGregory@seagullsoftware.com
 designates 216.82.242.67 as permitted sender)
From: Gary Gregory <GGregory@seagullsoftware.com>
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [runtime] Stability of memory mapped file support
Thread-Topic: [runtime] Stability of memory mapped file support
Thread-Index: AQHL4HIYIUs4DjdcbUiAJn7FFmRGN5QpjqgA//+sm8A=
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 06:24:36 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <02AA127CD8DCDE48BC7D2DFB6C87083A07E8BA9A@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com>
References: <AANLkTiksjDLvCzfJ98+C7UGOuds-P0UvsHy-mXzLFo5z@mail.gmail.com>
 <10137_1299910956_4D7B112B_10137_29974_1_4D7B1126.6030609@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <10137_1299910956_4D7B112B_10137_29974_1_4D7B1126.6030609@apache.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 01:23
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [runtime] Stability of memory mapped file support
>=20
> On 03/12/2011 05:57 AM, Steve Ash wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on something that could benefit from using large memory ma=
pped
> > files.  I have had bad experiences with the built in support, and the l=
ack
> > of deterministic unmapping in the past.  I am interested in the support
> > offered in Commons Runtime.  Is it complete or stable?  Any production =
time?
> >
>=20
> That's my sandbox project, and I'm currently reviewing the complete
> API since it collides/overlaps with Java7 API in some areas.
> Also I'll completely drop the Java5 support, so I wouldn't suggest
> you base anything on the current sandbox code any time soon.
>=20
> Anyhow, it's still in active development, and the original
> plan for replacing Daemon and Tomcat Native core functionality still
> stands, but since lots changed in JVM area since sandboxed, I
> had to rethink of few concepts, especially about using core Unsafe
> API which offers much higher JNI performance.
>=20
> Ping me back in a month or just watch the SVN activity, and I'll
> be able to give you more info then.
> Worse case? It might even go to the attic before exiting the sandbox.
> Sometimes I find developing inside ASF so frustrating, that I'm not
> sure I wish to do that again. It's not the same place I remember it
> was a decade ago.

Do you have suggestions for improvements?

Gary

>=20
>=20
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org