Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=UKzrivvx+YigomUjKuNIurjuDKJuJJB8VYA61CoFF5Z+pvWoNOgO16Ltmc1s/p4HnQ
         jEe95knjGslfrWaAIRHDQcmCslRF9tYSdj+GV6/Qnyatss5V14Rg9keH5LZcPH6RmbC2
         1r7qfhpOaNr1skCbiYgrX1L2wv3Akuf81HSt4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikEjEr0Dp-PG-Zrf=VHPE-NAx4mm8+RVq=KHyDx@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FBA64A2226777B498ED2F2131FAF53D904E73710@USILMS16.ca.com>
	<20610_1292338739_4D078632_20610_493_22_4D07862A.2060106@apache.org>
	<FBA64A2226777B498ED2F2131FAF53D904E73817@USILMS16.ca.com>
	<AANLkTikEjEr0Dp-PG-Zrf=VHPE-NAx4mm8+RVq=KHyDx@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:39:04 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTGESOxCSkNYcUuBg-MSEJOu0GmZJbGpdei0pp@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [daemon] what is the service wrapper replacement for Procrun and
 Jsvc?
From: Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org>
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64cc5a897a89a049763228d

--0016e64cc5a897a89a049763228d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:13 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 December 2010 15:09, Trei, Roberta L <Roberta.Trei@ca.com> wrote:
> > I saw this in the Apache-Commons archive mailing list:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-user/201011.mbox/%3cAAN
> > LkTikwx5z9+ryRf7BwJmoUmE=bE8z56VUCSHx=4Lx4@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> > Please let me know if this is not the case.  Given that the author was
> > from apache.org, it seemed official to me.  Though now that I look at it
> > more closely, I see the author may be referring only to his sub-product.
>
> It is the Apache Directory code which has been relegated to the attic,
> not Commons Daemon.
>
>
Yes yes sorry about the confusion. It is the Apache Directory code using
commons-daemon that was pushed into the attic.

Gosh we really have to watch out what and how we say what we say doh !!!

-- 
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu

--0016e64cc5a897a89a049763228d--