commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject Re: [io] is 2.0 on Maven?
Date Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:44:26 GMT
Niall Pemberton wrote:

> The reason the existing groupId was used was because it was a compatible
> release and so far in Commons we have not collectively or individually
> decided to relocate artifacts in that scenario.
> Its probably a discussion we should have over on dev@. Although it will
> create issues for users relocating all our artifacts (and adding
> redirection poms) - it is something that can be resolved by a user (AFAIK
> they just have to remove old artifacts from the local repo). I'm starting
> to think we should just bite the bullet and do it.

There's no reason for a relocation pom. It will even make things worse, 
because suddenly versions are treated as updates which we explicitly 
considered not tpo be.

-1 for any relocation POM in commons.

- Jörg

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message