Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20466 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2010 21:24:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2010 21:24:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 90209 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 21:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 89932 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 21:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 89916 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2010 21:24:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:24:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jpro.swt@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:24:46 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so6777771wya.30 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:24:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3hoxWEiQUNQNzAbvlELKhY969iS6uAF1oBHB59sOZFY=; b=VvO2Ff+ahitrs2IV7SuOrM85HxyxamYdSnUrdoDYKtAZz5OhTp8qIrSg38Tryy1ieP olJVa475R1xF1HT2rMM74201Mwv6ORUAJzeSVsTopF+61CER0Eteb6AFtpWNa6M8HrQU 5GRva5pPH9As2JaDGKy3VgaDz8YklLQH7BL+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FwEgL6fDhI7RZtXWu7YeDoFItKxZctlHK15/zFsoiPYoakKFpX3/uN+OCuSsAyOcu2 xEtDrGM4QEsrGKxeiXfHaa9w0WpvsGXnY7zcRSCFJ7+BL45MIPqCtncYzcvJ/HU1/g6/ Z7bIrCHe+j3Cs46K/sW2q/h1uohll/FGr19w8= Received: by 10.227.20.69 with SMTP id e5mr52750wbb.87.1283894665681; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [91.213.181.83] ([91.213.181.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p42sm4506907weq.36.2010.09.07.14.24.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C86AD87.8000707@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:24:23 +0300 From: J-Pro Reply-To: jpro.swt@gmail.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [vfs] Does VFS already has support for FTPS (FTP over SSL)? References: <4C474242.10608@gmail.com> <4C605981.8080505@gmail.com> <4C605E07.5080505@gmail.com> <1729BBE6-6E31-449C-8CD8-AA5642A6494B@dslextreme.com> <4C61B94B.30701@gmail.com> <4C81542F.1090808@gmail.com> <4C866CC7.80300@gmail.com> <86874119-A26C-4B90-8126-B0338625FD6A@dslextreme.com> <4C86A2B9.7070407@gmail.com> <4C86A5D9.4090602@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hmm, you committed it, thanks, I'll try to build it tomorrow! I'll definitely write here about the results! (I assume your svn client applied the patch better than mine) Great thanks! James Carman wrote: > Patch applied. Check out trunk to get the changes. > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:03 PM, James Carman wrote: > >> Either way, you're having the discussion in the right place. >> Remember, this stuff is all done by volunteers. We try to be >> responsive, but sometimes life gets in the way. The patch applied >> okay for me, by the way. >> >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:51 PM, J-Pro wrote: >> >>> I've started this discussion a month ago and seems that these people either >>> don't have an answer(which I doubt) or just didn't see my question. That's >>> why I asked about how can I reach them. >>> Well, anyway, it seems that currently Ralph is the only person who is able >>> to help me, so I'm waiting for his answer... >>> >>> Thanks for the answer. >>> >>> James Carman wrote: >>> >>>> Those people are probably monitoring this list. This is the best way >>>> to reach them. We prefer that the discussions happen on-list so that >>>> it's an open discussion that everyone can follow. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, J-Pro wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> How can I contact these people about this problem, don't you know? >>>>> About the patch... I've tried to apply it using TortoiseSVN, partially I >>>>> succeeded, but there are some code pieces which are not 100% clear for me >>>>> if >>>>> I should merge it or not. In other words I can't fully apply it to then >>>>> successfully build the code. Maybe you'll get it better, Ralph. If you >>>>> have >>>>> few free minutes, please try it... Waiting for your answer. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much, Ralph. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorry. There are actually only a couple of people actively >>>>>> committing >>>>>> to the VFS code base currently. The only answer I can give you is the >>>>>> same >>>>>> one as below. I can look at the patch and see what it would take to get >>>>>> it >>>>>> to apply, but I don't have an environment to test it. I assume by your >>>>>> question that you've attempted to apply it but can't determine how the >>>>>> patch >>>>>> needs to be modified so it will successfully apply? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 9:48 AM, J-Pro wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sorry, is my message not delivered or something? I doubt that VFS >>>>>>> developers doesn't know anything about patch in new version and release >>>>>>> date... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please answer, it's very important for me. Thank you very much in >>>>>>> advance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> J-Pro wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good afternoon again. >>>>>>>> Sorry for bothering you guys, but I really need this ability in VFS. >>>>>>>> Did >>>>>>>> anyone ever apply this patch? Or maybe there will be an update of VFS >>>>>>>> soon? >>>>>>>> Can some VFS developers answer me? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you very much in advance! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> J-Pro wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the link with patch. >>>>>>>>> I've tried to apply it with tortoise, but somewhy can't build the >>>>>>>>> project. Maybe tortoise messed up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway two questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1. Did anyone ever applied this patch? >>>>>>>>> 2. When the new(FTPS patched) version of VFS will be released >>>>>>>>> approximative? Because this patch in JIRA bug is there for more >>>>>>>>> than a year(!) and it's not yet in the last version... Is it >>>>>>>>> forgotten or what? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would be happy to incorporate the patch but I don't have an >>>>>>>>>> environment to test this. The patch doesn't include a test either. >>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>> someone can apply the patch in their environment. create an >>>>>>>>>> FtpsProviderTestCase and verify that it works then I'll go ahead and >>>>>>>>>> apply >>>>>>>>>> this along with the test case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:31 PM, James Carman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, the issue is still listed as "Open", so I doubt the patch >>>>>>>>>>> has been applied. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Steve wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Wools! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like was included in the 2.0 build back in 2009. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-264 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> S >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:59 PM, J-Pro wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's ok, thanks for the answer. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I meant FTPS, not SFTP. It's also known as FTP Secure and >>>>>>>>>>>>> FTP-SSL. >>>>>>>>>>>>> See >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wikipedia.org/wiki/FTPS >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I use SFTP successfully also, but now I need to connect to some >>>>>>>>>>>>> users >>>>>>>>>>>>> using FTPS and it would be very disappointing if I need to use >>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>> code for that... it won't quite fit into architecture already >>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> using Apache VFS... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org