And does the performance compare between R and commons math?
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Sachin Dole <sachin.dole@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you! I reached a similar inference reading up on the site and now
> after reading this email I feel like I have a strong confirmation. Thanks
> again.
>
> On Apr 28, 2010 9:11 PM, "Phil Steitz" <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sachin Dole wrote:
> > R probably has a large superset of features that math provides while it
> > tries...
> You are correct that in general R provides a superset of what
> commons math does, though there are a few things that commons math
> provides that R does not. There is a lot of overlap and in many
> cases the functionality that is provided by commons math is similar
> to what R provides, though of course the APIs are different. We test
> some of the commons math implementation classes against R (see the R
> subdirectory in src/test). Commons math will not be of much value
> as a wrapper / invocation framework for R; but it can be used
> directly to do some of the same computations that R does. This was
> part of the original motivation for creating commons math.
>
> The best way to get an overview of what is provided by commons math
> is to look at the User Guide:
> http://commons.apache.org/math/userguide/index.html
>
> Phil
>
> >
> > On Apr 28, 2010 6:22 AM, "Rory Winston" <rory.winston@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sachin
> >
> > Common...
>
