Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39636 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 18:28:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 18:28:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 91642 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 18:28:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91551 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 18:28:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91543 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 18:28:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:28:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [93.183.12.31] (HELO demumfd002.nsn-inter.net) (93.183.12.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:28:42 +0000 Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2HISKSd020121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:28:20 +0100 Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2HISJcS024418 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:28:20 +0100 Received: from DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.57]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:28:04 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC5FF.9563FE1A" Subject: Serializable alternative to MultiHashMap Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: <8457791F5F8D724798C8A255884203D602AF81A6@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Serializable alternative to MultiHashMap Thread-Index: AcrF/5UgmPLFm/NSToae1KCATdhNLw== From: "Reis Da Rocha, Adelino (NSN - PT/Aveiro)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2010 18:28:04.0831 (UTC) FILETIME=[95755EF0:01CAC5FF] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC5FF.9563FE1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Hi,=20 =20 I have been using MultiHashMap and according to documentation this objects has been set as deprecated and it is recomended that we use MultiValueMap however MultiValueMap is not serializable. =20 Is there any serializable alternative to MultiValueMap ? =20 Case not, why do you decided to deprecate MultiHashMap before providing a Serializable alternative ? =20 Is it expected MultiValueMap to be serializable in the near future ? =20 Regards, =20 Adelino. =20 =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC5FF.9563FE1A--