Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gcjcu-commons-user@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender)
Mail-Followup-To: user@commons.apache.org
To: user@commons.apache.org
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: 64bit windows server 2008 OS
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:17:50 +0200
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <h7i3ov$2p8$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <qJ5JWYNhn3N0.1fHJGVxt@smtp.mail.ovi.com>
Reply-To: joerg.schaible@gmx.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>

Hi Thanik,

Thanikaiarasu wrote:

> Dear All,
> I would like to know whether commons-dbcp 1.2.2 and commons-pool 1.4 will
> work properly in a 64bit windows server 2008 operating system without any
> issues. Kindly reply and provide any official link for knowing the same.

With very view exceptions all Apache Commons Components do not contain any
native code and are build to run on a JVM. It depends on the component
which version specification that JVM must implement, but that's all.
Commons-dbcp and commons-pool are not different to other Apache components
in this regard.

The platform independence is part of the Java specification and if you are
in doubt, you have to look for compatibility issues in the JVM vendor's
documentation of your target JVM.

Regards,
J�rg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org