Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ahhughes@gmail.com designates
 209.85.142.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=wVuhxv/ECcHGwhXK71nF9U83JZwLmT6i2uEFBvGEIFYsQLJyN7GAY8lBWeaADHhNCs
         GruVlRHBkeaqrGAoeFqJePAGNE2KR3qHupZr/kqrcGlUolvnrXh0miJ5UuQGtr6IbE+Z
         jiP2PeGcoSDVzrn1yuGWmKILNHrrkvMCvpYqs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <462514.30207.qm@web55103.mail.re4.yahoo.com>
References: <3ee326610902021420k35d3eb18vfa357e3ea09ddef0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <462514.30207.qm@web55103.mail.re4.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:42:31 +1030
Message-ID: <5f528cf40902081512md5d5853n577b8516c66e17b6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: JXPath - is JXPath dead in the water?
From: Andrew Hughes <ahhughes@gmail.com>
To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64e9300792fe40462706390

--0016e64e9300792fe40462706390
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Matt + Others,
Thanks for your replies! I've taken your advice and re-seeded my question on
a brand new thread with subject "JXPath over Generic Collection<?>, How?".
If anyone can help with this I would be MOST appreciative. Also, I am happy
to contribute back to the project with examples if I can get some svn
access.

Big thanks, and hopefully you can please read my other post (fingers
crossed).

Andrew.


On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> --- Adrian Mitev <adrian.mitev@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Matt Benson
> > <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Andrew Hughes <ahhughes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi All,
> > >> Is JXPath dead in the water? I can't find a post
> > >> here in 2009 and very
> > >> limited posts in 2008.
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >  JXPath is considered to be in "maintenance mode."
> > > In general, this means that this component is
> > > considered to be more or less "complete" and that
> > for
> > > the most part, changes to the code will target
> > bugs.
> > > Specifically with regard to JXPath, any new
> > features
> > > considered would address shortcomings with support
> > for
> > > the XPath 1.0 specification.  If you encounter
> > issues
> > > with JXPath feel free to post your questions to
> > this
> > > list; if you don't get an answer the first time
> > just
> > > keep pushing!  ;)
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Matt
> >
> > Will XPath2 be supported in the near future?
>
> Originally that was under consideration, but to be
> honest everything I personally know about XPath (1.0)
> I learned in the course of supporting JXPath, so as
> JXPath's primary maintainer I presently don't consider
> myself capable of making such an upgrade.  There is an
> open JIRA issue for XPath 2.0 support:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-67;
> further if you or anyone else has ideas on this feel
> free to start a discussion thread on
> dev@commons.apache.org (the real convention on these
> mailing lists is to preface your subject with the
> component ID e.g. "[jxpath] XPath 2 support").  A nice
> start might be a boiled-down list of the basic
> differences between versions 1 and 2.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > user-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--0016e64e9300792fe40462706390--