Return-Path: 
 <user-return-22240-apmail-commons-user-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 13030 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2008 18:27:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2008 18:27:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 94997 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2008 18:27:09 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93992 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2008 18:27:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93981 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2008 18:27:07 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:27:07 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.184] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.184)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:26:59 +0000
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so586921nfd.30
        for <user@commons.apache.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:26:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=3I7JATWJ0190XqTqlWUMPx9wGky9NhpLsgTn/wKxvOY=;
        b=RIjlRveiJpncREfnIom9inoTDGRCsrgQUXj/6m3SalBbFmPxaaXFN0rc4+yM33H2Wk
         maISWIiunJ5Yjy1i6GpLRnn0WeZ1dTOHnIloDtbqYeBojm1RqSfrvoh3yrOS29NMElrF
         x1yqphrDd8rd1M3dm+mZiK0UaXTLlEFOzaRrc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=eIc6KW6As6qsN+EHQuojPF6dW/vTB1Fs+i6zofebRdgmgELn3ekbQwE+h1VOHCWRir
         XxMePSn4QONE+pLwtAmcKb+fGUn3RihrStUFhcaEBVh3/4qnd0zcTLJA/5bhDsFmAGHD
         aEXR3TtRryz94ymvvsmfnIf8tT8rmroGubqK0=
Received: by 10.210.120.17 with SMTP id s17mr7700598ebc.54.1229970399485;
        Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.210.109.5 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ce1f2ea80812221026o58b1c9ddt898a0a3118c59392@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:26:39 -0500
From: "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>
To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: BSF 2.4 in one,
 two nutshell examples (Re: BSF? (Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression
 language
In-Reply-To: <494F7D61.3090309@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <44cb1ba30812161013m29a6a78fkdf2d33c022fa151c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cc9610990812161027j7a621654i752f800fbbbf92bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <494830F7.30709@apache.org>
	 <cc9610990812200752k7a75c24ft8b66533d79825581@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ce1f2ea80812201151v5374d714l62a748d9a62062e6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <494F7D61.3090309@apache.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
<rony@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ingmar Kliche
>> <ingmar.kliche@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rony,
>>> we used the native Rhino API. Would be interesting to see if BSF is useful
>>> for an integration with commons-SCXML.
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>> It is, and would be a welcome addition if it became available (in the
>> meantime, native rhino API is just fine too).
>>
> Surely, an available evaluation using JavaScript is great already.
>
<snip/>

Thanks for taking time to write the email, though I do understand the
value of BSF (perhaps more pronounced pre javax.script).

Commons SCXML has its abstractions for using expression / scripting
languages that its API leverages, what I was referring to in "if it
became available" was more the bridge from these to the BSF API.

-Rahul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org