Return-Path: 
 <user-return-22237-apmail-commons-user-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66710 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2008 19:52:16 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2008 19:52:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 67343 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2008 19:52:12 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-user-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67285 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2008 19:52:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67274 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2008 19:52:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:52:11 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.78.145 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.78.145] (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.145)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:52:05 +0000
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so155446eyg.60
        for <user@commons.apache.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=uRGD1a6UFWNAqQwdKxv0o058F3NCQNzKq/TsOj3wsrg=;
        b=nLABd/qbgiC2QmK1VHE1bInVH7wzK60SMzwEPBlcGoutTUVb7YW+xP6ka+ewnyqeuS
         dWJKVHv1glzx2HyMzdAR0p6p1uwOzbe2k5eqyWIOqjWWktTTqBGCJ+JQmR98j2+rlnLk
         k+uZkSJZhF6bTEisZhCXHvCJM2/GKTa4Pn7dk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=urKl3M44aGl7J7E9dflfgyVYc+O2XJJstFUvDYagXMM4noGNnzY7bnqewHyTiagBxJ
         cfj/NZOPrZcrkdfT8tl618JRfqONQvZOaKKaqgIQKwVD2gkl/Krk71CPm/rAyzkdzjoX
         EVxoyUNyQQg//9IKWe4+sgA8uD2975zeevyyk=
Received: by 10.210.142.10 with SMTP id p10mr5430462ebd.95.1229802703934;
        Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.210.112.11 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ce1f2ea80812201151v5374d714l62a748d9a62062e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:51:43 -0500
From: "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>
To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: BSF? (Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
In-Reply-To: <cc9610990812200752k7a75c24ft8b66533d79825581@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <44cb1ba30812161013m29a6a78fkdf2d33c022fa151c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cc9610990812161027j7a621654i752f800fbbbf92bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <494830F7.30709@apache.org>
	 <cc9610990812200752k7a75c24ft8b66533d79825581@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ingmar Kliche
<ingmar.kliche@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rony,
> we used the native Rhino API. Would be interesting to see if BSF is useful
> for an integration with commons-SCXML.
<snip/>

It is, and would be a welcome addition if it became available (in the
meantime, native rhino API is just fine too).

-Rahul


> Does BSF separate out context and
> evaluator?
>
> - Ingmar.
>
> 2008/12/16 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <rony@apache.org>
>
>> Hi Ingmar,
>>
>> how did that get implemented?
>>
>> Did you use by any chance BSF <http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf>? If so,
>> then not only JavaScript/Rhino would be available, but any of the
>> supported scripting languages!
>>
>> ---rony
>>
>>
>>
>> Ingmar Kliche wrote:
>> > Hi Roger,
>> >
>> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
>> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
>> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
>> test
>> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
>> > should be available.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Ingmar.
>> >
>> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <roger.hoover@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
>> Common
>> >> with Rhino?  Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
>> >> license
>> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
>> >>
>> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
>> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Roger
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org